PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGX vs. FNGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MAGX vs. FNGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MAGX vs. FNGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
-25.26%26.16%81.14%
FNGG
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares
-25.51%27.21%57.25%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MAGX having a -25.26% return and FNGG slightly lower at -25.51%.


MAGX

1D
9.45%
1M
-11.57%
YTD
-25.26%
6M
-22.65%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FNGG

1D
9.29%
1M
-9.53%
YTD
-25.51%
6M
-30.33%
1Y
27.54%
3Y*
50.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MAGX vs. FNGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGG's 0.98% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MAGX vs. FNGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGX
MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGG
FNGG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FNGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGG Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGX vs. FNGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGXFNGGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.69

0.51

+0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.36

1.13

+0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.15

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

0.61

+0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.19

1.73

+1.46

MAGX vs. FNGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the FNGG Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGX and FNGG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGXFNGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

0.51

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

-0.11

+0.65

Correlation

The correlation between MAGX and FNGG is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MAGX vs. FNGG - Dividend Comparison

MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than FNGG's 15.91% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
2.74%2.05%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNGG
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares
15.91%11.89%0.79%0.88%0.00%4.99%

Drawdowns

MAGX vs. FNGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, smaller than the maximum FNGG drawdown of -91.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and FNGG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGXFNGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.19%

-91.33%

+37.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.24%

-43.01%

+5.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.30%

-44.91%

+13.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.05%

-57.36%

+43.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.65%

15.04%

-3.39%

Volatility

MAGX vs. FNGG - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) has a higher volatility of 16.68% compared to Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) at 15.75%. This indicates that MAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MAGXFNGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.68%

15.75%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.86%

30.35%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.13%

54.10%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.62%

68.41%

-13.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.62%

68.41%

-13.79%