MAGX vs. DRLL

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

MAGX (Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF) and DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while DRLL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. MAGX is actively managed, while DRLL is passively managed. Over the past year, MAGX returned 28.07% vs 41.89% for DRLL. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MAGX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DRLL.

Performance

MAGX vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGX achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 33.53% return.

MAGX

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 9.92%
• 6M: 4.52%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 1Y: 28.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 41.16%

DRLL

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 11.55%
• 6M: 17.30%
• YTD: 33.53%
• 1Y: 41.89%
• 3Y*: 12.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	$455.44K	$502.20K	$532.52K
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF	$3.93M	$4.39M	$4.75M

MAGX vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF	0.37%	26.16%	82.41%
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	33.53%	7.74%	-1.49%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGX and DRLL is -0.29, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024	-0.05

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between MAGX and DRLL has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.05 to -0.29, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

MAGX vs. DRLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MAGX	DRLL
Financial Services	35.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	99.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MAGX vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAGX

MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 25
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

DRLL

DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 61
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 62
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAGX vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAGX	DRLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.63	1.83	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	2.37	-1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.30	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.76	2.48	-1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.03	6.29	-4.25

MAGX vs. DRLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the DRLL Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGX and DRLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAGX vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, which is greater than DRLL's maximum drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and DRLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGX	DRLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.19%	-23.73%	-30.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.24%	-16.99%	-20.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.51%	-6.51%	-2.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.91%	-8.14%	-5.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.85%	6.68%	+7.17%

Volatility

MAGX vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) has a higher volatility of 17.19% compared to Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) at 7.12%. This indicates that MAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGX	DRLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.19%	7.12%	+10.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.81%	18.68%	+17.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.80%	22.97%	+21.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.95%	23.79%	+30.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.95%	23.79%	+30.16%

MAGX vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGX vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison

MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than DRLL's 2.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	2.27%	2.99%	3.00%	3.01%	1.18%
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF	2.04%	2.05%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGX and DRLL in my portfolio?

MAGX and DRLL have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAGX or DRLL?

MAGX has higher volatility (17.19%) compared to DRLL (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGX dropped -54.19% vs DRLL's -23.73%.

Which ETF is better, MAGX or DRLL?

On 1-year performance, DRLL leads with 41.89% vs 28.07% for MAGX. On fees, DRLL is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, DRLL has been the lower-risk option at 7.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGX or DRLL?

Over the 1-year period, DRLL has performed better with a 41.89% return vs 28.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGX or DRLL?

DRLL is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MAGX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGX or DRLL?

DRLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 2.04% for MAGX.

What is the main difference between MAGX and DRLL?

MAGX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DRLL is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MAGX and 0.41% for DRLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.