PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGSX vs. GTSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGSX vs. GTSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Aggressive Allocation Fund (MAGSX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGSX achieves a 11.80% return, which is significantly higher than GTSGX's -1.68% return. Over the past 10 years, MAGSX has underperformed GTSGX with an annualized return of 7.69%, while GTSGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.41% annualized return.


MAGSX

1D
0.45%
1M
5.24%
YTD
11.80%
6M
12.39%
1Y
22.10%
3Y*
12.80%
5Y*
5.44%
10Y*
7.69%

GTSGX

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.74%
YTD
-1.68%
6M
-1.41%
1Y
-0.33%
3Y*
9.74%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGSX vs. GTSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAGSX
Madison Aggressive Allocation Fund
11.80%12.48%6.46%12.32%-15.38%9.50%9.65%19.21%-6.59%18.04%
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
-1.68%1.62%10.24%26.51%-13.60%26.31%9.45%33.53%-1.60%15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGSX and GTSGX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2006

0.89

The correlation between MAGSX and GTSGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGSX vs. GTSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGSX
MAGSX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MAGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

GTSGX
GTSGX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
GTSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
GTSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGSX vs. GTSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Aggressive Allocation Fund (MAGSX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGSXGTSGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.02

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

0.08

+2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.23

0.19

+11.04

MAGSX vs. GTSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the GTSGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGSX and GTSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGSXGTSGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

0.06

+2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.38

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.58

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.15

+0.22

Drawdowns

MAGSX vs. GTSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGSX drawdown since its inception was -56.06%, smaller than the maximum GTSGX drawdown of -73.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGSX and GTSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGSXGTSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.06%

-73.82%

+17.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-11.99%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.35%

-19.63%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.13%

-21.94%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.20%

-38.25%

+15.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.49%

+7.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.47%

-29.69%

+20.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

4.83%

-2.80%

Volatility

MAGSX vs. GTSGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison Aggressive Allocation Fund (MAGSX) is 3.32%, while Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that MAGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGSXGTSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

4.05%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

10.12%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.62%

14.70%

-4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.18%

17.43%

-5.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.07%

18.07%

-5.00%

MAGSX vs. GTSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGSX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than GTSGX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGSX vs. GTSGX - Dividend Comparison

MAGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than GTSGX's 3.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
3.43%3.37%5.76%1.25%1.96%4.38%3.43%3.74%7.57%3.58%4.34%6.09%
MAGSX
Madison Aggressive Allocation Fund
5.52%6.17%2.02%1.89%1.26%9.97%8.66%5.42%10.79%5.89%3.82%9.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGSX and GTSGX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTSGX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to MAGSX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGSX dropped -56.06% vs GTSGX's -73.82%.

MAGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGSX and GTSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer