MAGS vs. SPYM
MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. MAGS is actively managed, while SPYM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MAGS returned 33.71%/yr vs 22.46%/yr for SPYM. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MAGS charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
MAGS vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a 3.73% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 10.98% return.
MAGS
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 3.73%
- 6M
- 3.62%
- 1Y
- 31.34%
- 3Y*
- 33.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYM
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.98%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 28.09%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.91%
- 10Y*
- 15.62%
MAGS vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 3.73% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 37.32% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 10.98% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 17.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGS and SPYM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2023 | 0.80 |
The correlation between MAGS and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
MAGS vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MAGS
SPYM
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MAGS
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
MAGS
SPYM
Communication Services
MAGS
SPYM
Basic Materials
MAGS
-
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
MAGS
-
SPYM
Energy
MAGS
-
SPYM
Financial Services
MAGS
-
SPYM
Healthcare
MAGS
-
SPYM
Industrials
MAGS
-
SPYM
Real Estate
MAGS
-
SPYM
Utilities
MAGS
-
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGS vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
MAGS
SPYM
MAGS vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAGS | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.44 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 3.17 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | 14.76 | -8.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGS | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.39 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.55 | 0.62 | +0.93 |
Drawdowns
MAGS vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGS | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.91% | -54.46% | +24.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.62% | -8.90% | -9.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.91% | -18.72% | -11.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.55% | -0.66% | -2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -7.15% | +2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.37% | 1.91% | +3.46% |
Volatility
MAGS vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.83%. This indicates that MAGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGS | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 2.83% | +1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.31% | 8.90% | +5.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.08% | 11.80% | +8.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 16.80% | +9.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 18.00% | +7.94% |
MAGS vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGS vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than SPYM's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.43% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGS and SPYM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAGS has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to SPYM (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 33.71% vs 22.46% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 33.71% return vs 22.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for MAGS.
MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 1.00% for SPYM.
MAGS is categorized as Technology Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for MAGS and 0.02% for SPYM.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGS and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer