MAGS vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. MAGS is actively managed, while QQQM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MAGS returned 33.71%/yr vs 28.89%/yr for QQQM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MAGS charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

MAGS vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a 3.73% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.

MAGS

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 2.17%
• YTD: 3.73%
• 6M: 3.62%
• 1Y: 31.34%
• 3Y*: 33.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQM

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 10.67%
• YTD: 21.39%
• 6M: 19.75%
• 1Y: 41.98%
• 3Y*: 28.89%
• 5Y*: 18.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGS vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	3.73%	22.99%	63.97%	37.32%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	21.39%	20.85%	25.68%	30.47%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGS and QQQM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2023	0.89

The correlation between MAGS and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAGS vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MAGS	QQQM
Technology	15.3%	53.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	12.3%
Communication Services	9.3%	15.8%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Energy	-	0.6%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Industrials	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

MAGS vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 39
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 40
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 37

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 74
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGS vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAGS	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	2.65	-1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	3.46	-1.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.45	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	3.53	-1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.85	13.52	-7.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAGS vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGS and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAGS	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	2.65	-1.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.55	0.85	+0.70

Drawdowns

MAGS vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGS	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.91%	-35.04%	+5.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.62%	-11.96%	-6.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.91%	-22.70%	-7.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.55%	-0.20%	-3.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.70%	-8.25%	+3.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.37%	3.11%	+2.26%

Volatility

MAGS vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.48%. This indicates that MAGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGS	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.80%	4.48%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.31%	12.05%	+2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.08%	15.91%	+4.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.94%	22.24%	+3.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.94%	22.12%	+3.82%

MAGS vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGS vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.43%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.41%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGS and QQQM in my portfolio?

MAGS and QQQM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAGS or QQQM?

MAGS has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which ETF is better, MAGS or QQQM?

On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 33.71% vs 28.89% for QQQM. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGS or QQQM?

Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 33.71% return vs 28.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGS or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for MAGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGS or QQQM?

MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.

What is the main difference between MAGS and QQQM?

MAGS is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for MAGS and 0.15% for QQQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.