MAGO vs. BUCK
MAGO (Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF) and BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Tuttle, while BUCK is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MAGO charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BUCK.
Performance
MAGO vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGO achieves a -5.64% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 2.12% return.
MAGO
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -10.07%
- YTD
- -5.64%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUCK
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 6.93%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGO vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAGO Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF | -5.64% | -0.88% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 2.12% | 0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGO and BUCK is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGO vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank
MAGO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BUCK
MAGO vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF (MAGO) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAGO | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.50 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.32 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 28.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAGO vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGO drawdown since its inception was -18.21%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGO and BUCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGO | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.21% | -5.43% | -12.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.08% | -0.04% | -12.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -0.49% | -5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.24% | — |
Volatility
MAGO vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGO | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.22% | 2.98% | +21.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.22% | 3.46% | +20.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.22% | 3.46% | +20.76% |
MAGO vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGO vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison
MAGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, more than BUCK's 7.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 7.40% | 7.59% | 8.84% | 4.84% | 0.59% |
MAGO Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF | 8.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGO and BUCK have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MAGO.
MAGO has the higher dividend yield at 8.00%, compared with 7.40% for BUCK.
MAGO is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MAGO and 0.35% for BUCK.
Find the right allocation for MAGO and BUCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer