PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGG vs. SFY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGG vs. SFY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG) and SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGG achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than SFY's 14.51% return.


MAGG

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.15%
6M
0.22%
1Y
5.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SFY

1D
-1.03%
1M
7.58%
YTD
14.51%
6M
14.56%
1Y
35.49%
3Y*
27.51%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGG vs. SFY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MAGG
Madison Aggregate Bond ETF
0.15%7.28%1.81%4.42%
SFY
SoFi Select 500 ETF
14.51%22.67%29.81%7.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGG and SFY is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2023

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGG vs. SFY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGG
MAGG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
MAGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

SFY
SFY Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGG vs. SFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG) and SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGGSFYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.43

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

3.31

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.88

14.43

-8.55

MAGG vs. SFY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the SFY Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGG and SFY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGGSFYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.47

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.90

+0.14

Drawdowns

MAGG vs. SFY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGG drawdown since its inception was -4.56%, smaller than the maximum SFY drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGG and SFY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGGSFYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.56%

-33.25%

+28.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-10.79%

+7.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-1.03%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-6.19%

+4.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

2.47%

-1.54%

Volatility

MAGG vs. SFY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG) is 1.17%, while SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that MAGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGGSFYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

4.04%

-2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.58%

11.09%

-8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.99%

14.45%

-10.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.75%

19.02%

-14.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.75%

20.20%

-15.45%

MAGG vs. SFY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SFY's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGG vs. SFY - Dividend Comparison

MAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than SFY's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
MAGG
Madison Aggregate Bond ETF
4.74%4.80%5.13%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SFY
SoFi Select 500 ETF
0.84%0.96%0.99%1.40%1.61%0.90%1.18%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGG and SFY have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFY has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to MAGG (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGG dropped -4.56% vs SFY's -33.25%.

On 1-year performance, SFY leads with 35.49% vs 5.46% for MAGG. On fees, SFY is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, MAGG has been the lower-risk option at 1.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SFY has performed better with a 35.49% return vs 5.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SFY is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MAGG.

MAGG has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 0.84% for SFY.

MAGG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while SFY is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Madison and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MAGG and 0.00% for SFY.

SFY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGG and SFY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer