MAGG vs. DCMT

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

MAGG (Madison Aggregate Bond ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGG is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Madison, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAGG returned 2.56% vs 29.63% for DCMT. Their -0.23 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MAGG charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.

Performance

MAGG vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGG achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 24.74% return.

MAGG

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -0.83%
• 6M: -0.23%
• YTD: -0.17%
• 1Y: 2.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.51%

DCMT

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 6.02%
• 6M: 16.61%
• YTD: 24.74%
• 1Y: 29.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	$307.72K	$268.91K	$199.57K
MAGG Madison Aggregate Bond ETF	$21.79K	$44.17K	$116.59K

MAGG vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MAGG Madison Aggregate Bond ETF	-0.17%	7.28%	2.12%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	24.74%	6.04%	3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGG and DCMT is -0.37, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	-0.23

The correlation between MAGG and DCMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.37 (1 year) to -0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MAGG vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAGG

MAGG Risk / Return Rank: 25
MAGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MAGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
MAGG Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MAGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
MAGG Martin Ratio Rank: 26

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 52
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 53
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAGG vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAGG	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	1.56	-0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.02	2.16	-1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.27	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	1.86	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.32	6.16	-3.85

MAGG vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGG Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGG and DCMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAGG vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGG drawdown since its inception was -4.56%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGG and DCMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGG	DCMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.56%	-15.96%	+11.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.86%	-15.96%	+13.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.84%	-10.46%	+8.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.26%	-3.63%	+2.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	4.82%	-3.71%

Volatility

MAGG vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG) is 0.93%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that MAGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGG	DCMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.93%	5.57%	-4.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.73%	16.66%	-13.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.84%	19.04%	-15.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.68%	16.06%	-11.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.68%	16.06%	-11.38%

MAGG vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGG vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

MAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than DCMT's 2.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.94%	3.67%	1.59%	0.00%
MAGG Madison Aggregate Bond ETF	4.87%	4.80%	5.13%	1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGG and DCMT in my portfolio?

MAGG and DCMT have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAGG or DCMT?

DCMT has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to MAGG (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGG dropped -4.56% vs DCMT's -15.96%.

Which ETF is better, MAGG or DCMT?

On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 29.63% vs 2.56% for MAGG. On fees, MAGG is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, MAGG has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGG or DCMT?

Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 29.63% return vs 2.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGG or DCMT?

MAGG is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGG or DCMT?

MAGG has the higher dividend yield at 4.87%, compared with 2.94% for DCMT.

What is the main difference between MAGG and DCMT?

MAGG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Madison and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MAGG and 0.66% for DCMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DCMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.