PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAFOX vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAFOX vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Fund (MAFOX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAFOX achieves a 15.80% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MAFOX having a 17.63% annualized return and VUG not far ahead at 18.26%.


MAFOX

1D
0.00%
1M
8.99%
YTD
15.80%
6M
15.18%
1Y
28.52%
3Y*
25.86%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*
17.63%

VUG

1D
-1.23%
1M
6.22%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAFOX vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAFOX
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Fund
15.80%12.76%31.11%52.63%-38.05%17.13%46.85%31.16%3.63%29.90%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.49%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between MAFOX and VUG is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.92

The correlation between MAFOX and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAFOX vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAFOX
MAFOX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MAFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MAFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAFOX vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Fund (MAFOX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAFOXVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

1.69

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.92

5.92

-0.01

MAFOX vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAFOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAFOX and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAFOXVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.77

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.68

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.85

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.62

-0.50

Drawdowns

MAFOX vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAFOX drawdown since its inception was -89.93%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAFOX and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAFOXVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.93%

-50.68%

-39.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.70%

-16.53%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.48%

-22.85%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.39%

-35.61%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.39%

-35.61%

-6.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.51%

+1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.23%

-7.09%

-47.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

4.71%

+0.24%

Volatility

MAFOX vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Fund (MAFOX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) have volatilities of 3.98% and 3.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAFOXVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

3.83%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.42%

12.11%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.29%

15.84%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.61%

22.22%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.67%

21.44%

+1.23%

MAFOX vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAFOX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAFOX vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

MAFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.84%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAFOX
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Fund
13.84%16.03%4.04%3.05%2.01%11.20%0.53%5.45%4.43%4.06%0.00%4.66%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, MAFOX and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MAFOX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to VUG (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAFOX dropped -89.93% vs VUG's -50.68%.

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAFOX and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer