PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MADE vs. SEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MADE vs. SEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF (MADE) and U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MADE achieves a 22.94% return, which is significantly higher than SEA's 20.79% return.


MADE

1D
0.07%
1M
4.90%
YTD
22.94%
6M
24.56%
1Y
50.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SEA

1D
-0.80%
1M
0.23%
YTD
20.79%
6M
21.12%
1Y
30.09%
3Y*
18.52%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MADE vs. SEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MADE
iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF
22.94%27.34%2.10%
SEA
U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
20.79%16.78%-9.41%

Correlation

The correlation between MADE and SEA is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024

0.50

MADE vs. SEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MADE
SEA

Industrials

72.6%
82.7%

Technology

16.9%
-1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%

-

Energy

1.8%
17.3%

Utilities

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

MADE
72.6%
SEA
82.7%

Technology

MADE
16.9%
SEA
-1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MADE
8.4%
SEA

-

Energy

MADE
1.8%
SEA
17.3%

Utilities

MADE
0.1%
SEA

-

Basic Materials

MADE

-

SEA

-

Communication Services

MADE

-

SEA
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

MADE

-

SEA

-

Financial Services

MADE

-

SEA

-

Healthcare

MADE

-

SEA

-

Real Estate

MADE

-

SEA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MADE vs. SEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MADE
MADE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MADE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MADE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MADE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MADE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MADE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SEA
SEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MADE vs. SEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF (MADE) and U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MADESEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.32

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

2.83

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.45

11.52

+4.93

MADE vs. SEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MADE Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the SEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MADE and SEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MADESEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.86

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

0.39

+0.89

Drawdowns

MADE vs. SEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MADE drawdown since its inception was -23.79%, smaller than the maximum SEA drawdown of -39.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MADE and SEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MADESEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.79%

-39.53%

+15.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.43%

-10.67%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.07%

+3.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-14.31%

+10.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.62%

+0.44%

Volatility

MADE vs. SEA - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF (MADE) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) at 5.17%. This indicates that MADE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MADESEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

5.17%

+2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.99%

12.01%

+4.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.51%

16.28%

+4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.30%

21.67%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.30%

21.67%

+0.63%

MADE vs. SEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MADE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SEA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

MADE vs. SEA - Dividend Comparison

MADE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than SEA's 5.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MADE
iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF
0.65%0.89%0.34%0.00%0.00%
SEA
U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
5.59%6.76%18.47%9.85%18.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


MADE and SEA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MADE has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to SEA (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MADE dropped -23.79% vs SEA's -39.53%.

On 1-year performance, MADE leads with 50.25% vs 30.09% for SEA. On fees, MADE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SEA has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MADE has performed better with a 50.25% return vs 30.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MADE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SEA.

SEA has the higher dividend yield at 5.59%, compared with 0.65% for MADE.

MADE tracks S&P U.S. Manufacturing Select Index, while SEA tracks U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and US Global. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MADE and 0.60% for SEA.

MADE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MADE and SEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer