MADCX vs. GQGPX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) and GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GQGPX).
MADCX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 31, 1989. GQGPX is managed by GQG Partners Inc. It was launched on Dec 27, 2016.
Performance
MADCX vs. GQGPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MADCX vs. GQGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MADCX BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. | 1.43% | 30.47% | -1.09% | 10.77% | -24.12% | -1.14% | 24.53% | 26.47% | -10.73% | 40.07% |
GQGPX GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 2.09% | 9.67% | 6.00% | 28.47% | -21.01% | -2.52% | 33.74% | 20.92% | -14.91% | 29.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MADCX achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than GQGPX's 2.09% return.
MADCX
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- -10.92%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 6.19%
- 1Y
- 31.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
GQGPX
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 12.31%
- 3Y*
- 13.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.16%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MADCX vs. GQGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MADCX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than GQGPX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MADCX vs. GQGPX — Risk / Return Rank
MADCX
GQGPX
MADCX vs. GQGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) and GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GQGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MADCX | GQGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 0.99 | +0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 1.41 | +0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.18 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 1.34 | +0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.51 | 4.62 | +3.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MADCX | GQGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 0.99 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.22 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.52 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between MADCX and GQGPX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MADCX vs. GQGPX - Dividend Comparison
MADCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than GQGPX's 1.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MADCX BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. | 4.20% | 4.26% | 1.90% | 1.67% | 2.22% | 5.72% | 0.97% | 1.53% | 0.98% | 0.48% | 1.82% | 1.34% |
GQGPX GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 1.88% | 1.91% | 1.50% | 2.54% | 5.52% | 3.78% | 0.15% | 1.06% | 0.59% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MADCX vs. GQGPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MADCX drawdown since its inception was -66.58%, which is greater than GQGPX's maximum drawdown of -33.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MADCX and GQGPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MADCX | GQGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.58% | -33.68% | -32.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.57% | -9.12% | -6.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.70% | -30.02% | -10.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.27% | -7.43% | -5.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.45% | -11.70% | -6.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 2.65% | +1.07% |
Volatility
MADCX vs. GQGPX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) has a higher volatility of 10.96% compared to GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GQGPX) at 5.92%. This indicates that MADCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MADCX | GQGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.96% | 5.92% | +5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.88% | 9.00% | +6.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.16% | 12.53% | +7.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 14.73% | +2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 15.99% | +2.28% |