MADCX vs. EEM
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM).
MADCX is managed by Blackrock. It was launched on Aug 31, 1989. EEM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. It was launched on Apr 11, 2003.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MADCX or EEM.
Correlation
The correlation between MADCX and EEM is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MADCX vs. EEM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MADCX:
0.24
EEM:
0.90
MADCX:
0.43
EEM:
1.36
MADCX:
1.05
EEM:
1.17
MADCX:
0.10
EEM:
0.49
MADCX:
0.67
EEM:
2.81
MADCX:
5.33%
EEM:
5.00%
MADCX:
14.97%
EEM:
15.61%
MADCX:
-74.35%
EEM:
-66.43%
MADCX:
-32.42%
EEM:
-18.27%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MADCX achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 3.23% return. Over the past 10 years, MADCX has outperformed EEM with an annualized return of 3.47%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively lower 3.07% annualized return.
MADCX
1.06%
0.51%
2.29%
3.64%
-0.44%
3.47%
EEM
3.23%
2.42%
7.99%
14.22%
1.84%
3.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MADCX vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MADCX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than EEM's 0.68% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MADCX vs. EEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MADCX
EEM
MADCX vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MADCX vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison
MADCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than EEM's 2.36% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MADCX BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. | 1.89% | 1.91% | 1.67% | 2.22% | 0.94% | 0.97% | 1.53% | 0.98% | 0.48% | 1.82% | 1.34% | 0.56% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.36% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% | 2.23% |
Drawdowns
MADCX vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MADCX drawdown since its inception was -74.35%, which is greater than EEM's maximum drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MADCX and EEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MADCX vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) have volatilities of 4.93% and 4.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.