MADCX vs. EEM

In the year-to-date period, MADCX achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 7.39% return. Over the past 10 years, MADCX has outperformed EEM with an annualized return of 3.34%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.85% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

MADCX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than EEM's 0.68% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MADCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the EEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MADCX and EEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MADCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than EEM's 2.26% yield.

The maximum MADCX drawdown since its inception was -74.35%, which is greater than EEM's maximum drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MADCX and EEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.