Correlation
The correlation between MADCX and EEMV is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
MADCX vs. EEMV
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV).
MADCX is managed by Blackrock. It was launched on Aug 31, 1989. EEMV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MADCX or EEMV.
Performance
MADCX vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
MADCX:
0.22
EEMV:
1.11
MADCX:
0.35
EEMV:
1.52
MADCX:
1.04
EEMV:
1.21
MADCX:
0.08
EEMV:
0.95
MADCX:
0.40
EEMV:
2.80
MADCX:
7.32%
EEMV:
4.23%
MADCX:
18.76%
EEMV:
11.44%
MADCX:
-66.57%
EEMV:
-31.56%
MADCX:
-25.82%
EEMV:
-1.09%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MADCX achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly higher than EEMV's 5.47% return. Over the past 10 years, MADCX has outperformed EEMV with an annualized return of 4.39%, while EEMV has yielded a comparatively lower 3.05% annualized return.
MADCX
6.24%
3.17%
5.43%
4.02%
2.94%
3.01%
4.39%
EEMV
5.47%
1.12%
4.51%
12.63%
4.85%
5.38%
3.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MADCX vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MADCX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MADCX vs. EEMV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MADCX
EEMV
MADCX vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
MADCX vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison
MADCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than EEMV's 3.32% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MADCX BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. | 1.79% | 1.91% | 1.67% | 2.22% | 5.72% | 0.97% | 1.53% | 0.98% | 0.48% | 1.82% | 1.34% | 0.56% |
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.32% | 3.50% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.34% | 2.79% | 2.55% | 2.71% |
Drawdowns
MADCX vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MADCX drawdown since its inception was -66.57%, which is greater than EEMV's maximum drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MADCX and EEMV.
Loading data...
Volatility
MADCX vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) at 3.05%. This indicates that MADCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...