PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GQGPX vs. XCEM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GQGPX vs. XCEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GQGPX) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.83%
-0.86%
GQGPX
XCEM

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQGPX achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly higher than XCEM's 2.84% return.


GQGPX

YTD

6.54%

1M

-4.82%

6M

-6.73%

1Y

14.93%

5Y (annualized)

7.88%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

XCEM

YTD

2.84%

1M

-4.01%

6M

-0.22%

1Y

9.91%

5Y (annualized)

4.79%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Key characteristics


GQGPXXCEM
Sharpe Ratio0.890.68
Sortino Ratio1.241.00
Omega Ratio1.191.13
Calmar Ratio0.770.81
Martin Ratio3.473.02
Ulcer Index4.17%3.19%
Daily Std Dev16.30%14.17%
Max Drawdown-34.66%-40.92%
Current Drawdown-11.36%-7.87%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GQGPX vs. XCEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQGPX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than XCEM's 0.16% expense ratio.


GQGPX
GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund
Expense ratio chart for GQGPX: current value at 1.22% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.22%
Expense ratio chart for XCEM: current value at 0.16% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.16%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between GQGPX and XCEM is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GQGPX vs. XCEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GQGPX) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GQGPX, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.000.890.68
The chart of Sortino ratio for GQGPX, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.241.00
The chart of Omega ratio for GQGPX, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.191.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for GQGPX, currently valued at 0.77, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.000.770.81
The chart of Martin ratio for GQGPX, currently valued at 3.47, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.473.02
GQGPX
XCEM

The current GQGPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the XCEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQGPX and XCEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.89
0.68
GQGPX
XCEM

Dividends

GQGPX vs. XCEM - Dividend Comparison

GQGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than XCEM's 1.19% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQGPX
GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund
2.38%2.53%5.52%2.27%0.15%2.39%0.59%0.17%0.00%0.00%
XCEM
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF
1.19%1.22%2.42%1.94%1.63%2.11%3.24%8.57%1.24%2.57%

Drawdowns

GQGPX vs. XCEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQGPX drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, smaller than the maximum XCEM drawdown of -40.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGPX and XCEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-11.36%
-7.87%
GQGPX
XCEM

Volatility

GQGPX vs. XCEM - Volatility Comparison

GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GQGPX) has a higher volatility of 8.72% compared to Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) at 3.41%. This indicates that GQGPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.72%
3.41%
GQGPX
XCEM