GQGPX vs. XCEM
Compare and contrast key facts about GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GQGPX) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM).
GQGPX is managed by GQG Partners Inc. It was launched on Dec 27, 2016. XCEM is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Sep 2, 2015.
Performance
GQGPX vs. XCEM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GQGPX vs. XCEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQGPX GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 2.09% | 9.67% | 6.00% | 28.47% | -21.01% | -2.52% | 33.74% | 20.92% | -14.91% | 29.81% |
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 7.38% | 34.05% | 0.42% | 19.96% | -17.59% | 7.87% | 9.47% | 19.74% | -11.75% | 33.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GQGPX achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly lower than XCEM's 7.38% return.
GQGPX
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 12.31%
- 3Y*
- 13.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.16%
- 10Y*
- —
XCEM
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- YTD
- 7.38%
- 6M
- 16.57%
- 1Y
- 43.07%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GQGPX vs. XCEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQGPX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than XCEM's 0.16% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GQGPX vs. XCEM — Risk / Return Rank
GQGPX
XCEM
GQGPX vs. XCEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GQGPX) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GQGPX | XCEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 2.14 | -1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 2.82 | -1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.41 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 3.06 | -1.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.62 | 12.61 | -7.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GQGPX | XCEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 2.14 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.44 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.52 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between GQGPX and XCEM is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GQGPX vs. XCEM - Dividend Comparison
GQGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than XCEM's 3.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQGPX GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 1.88% | 1.91% | 1.50% | 2.54% | 5.52% | 3.78% | 0.15% | 1.06% | 0.59% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 3.03% | 3.25% | 2.76% | 1.22% | 2.42% | 1.94% | 1.63% | 2.11% | 2.70% | 9.56% | 1.24% | 2.63% |
Drawdowns
GQGPX vs. XCEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQGPX drawdown since its inception was -33.68%, smaller than the maximum XCEM drawdown of -41.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGPX and XCEM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQGPX | XCEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.68% | -41.24% | +7.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.12% | -14.46% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.02% | -29.67% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.43% | -10.16% | +2.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.70% | -8.70% | -3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 3.51% | -0.86% |
Volatility
GQGPX vs. XCEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GQGPX) is 5.92%, while Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) has a volatility of 10.37%. This indicates that GQGPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GQGPX | XCEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 10.37% | -4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 15.60% | -6.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.53% | 20.21% | -7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 17.15% | -2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 19.53% | -3.54% |