PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MACGX vs. TEMUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MACGX vs. TEMUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A (MACGX) and Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (TEMUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MACGX achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly lower than TEMUX's 28.37% return. Over the past 10 years, MACGX has outperformed TEMUX with an annualized return of 14.70%, while TEMUX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.29% annualized return.


MACGX

1D
-1.67%
1M
5.93%
YTD
6.63%
6M
3.09%
1Y
5.74%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
-3.23%
10Y*
14.70%

TEMUX

1D
0.99%
1M
9.76%
YTD
28.37%
6M
31.24%
1Y
57.52%
3Y*
23.94%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MACGX vs. TEMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MACGX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A
6.63%13.71%42.06%46.30%-63.51%-12.84%142.01%39.41%11.85%38.99%
TEMUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund
28.37%34.68%5.47%9.87%-21.75%-3.50%11.18%22.44%-18.73%39.16%

Correlation

The correlation between MACGX and TEMUX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 1997

0.54

The correlation between MACGX and TEMUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MACGX vs. TEMUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MACGX
MACGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MACGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MACGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MACGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MACGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MACGX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

TEMUX
TEMUX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
TEMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TEMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MACGX vs. TEMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A (MACGX) and Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (TEMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MACGXTEMUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.70

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

5.14

-4.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.55

19.34

-18.79

MACGX vs. TEMUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MACGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the TEMUX Sharpe Ratio of 3.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MACGX and TEMUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MACGXTEMUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

3.94

-3.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.42

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.53

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.28

+0.04

Drawdowns

MACGX vs. TEMUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MACGX drawdown since its inception was -77.61%, which is greater than TEMUX's maximum drawdown of -68.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MACGX and TEMUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MACGXTEMUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.61%

-68.20%

-9.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.55%

-13.10%

-14.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.55%

-16.86%

-11.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.61%

-38.67%

-38.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.61%

-40.17%

-37.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.72%

0.00%

-40.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.65%

-21.84%

-3.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.75%

3.28%

+9.47%

Volatility

MACGX vs. TEMUX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A (MACGX) has a higher volatility of 8.96% compared to Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (TEMUX) at 7.17%. This indicates that MACGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MACGXTEMUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.96%

7.17%

+1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.23%

14.24%

+6.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.81%

17.11%

+10.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.30%

17.33%

+30.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.37%

17.75%

+21.62%

MACGX vs. TEMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MACGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TEMUX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

MACGX vs. TEMUX - Dividend Comparison

MACGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TEMUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MACGX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%52.53%9.95%15.34%29.46%48.48%75.72%14.05%
TEMUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund
1.89%2.43%2.09%2.41%1.92%4.47%1.96%1.81%1.67%1.26%1.10%1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


MACGX and TEMUX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MACGX has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to TEMUX (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MACGX dropped -77.61% vs TEMUX's -68.20%.

TEMUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MACGX and TEMUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer