MACGX vs. FSMDX

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

MACGX (Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A) and FSMDX (Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund) are both mutual funds - MACGX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Morgan Stanley, while FSMDX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index. Over the past 10 years, MACGX returned 13.03%/yr vs 11.36%/yr for FSMDX. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MACGX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FSMDX.

Performance

MACGX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A (MACGX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MACGX achieves a -3.13% return, which is significantly lower than FSMDX's 14.24% return. Over the past 10 years, MACGX has outperformed FSMDX with an annualized return of 13.03%, while FSMDX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.36% annualized return.

MACGX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -3.02%
• 6M: -4.00%
• YTD: -3.13%
• 1Y: -11.41%
• 3Y*: 19.23%
• 5Y*: -7.12%
• 10Y*: 13.03%
• ALL TIME*: 9.63%

FSMDX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -0.26%
• 6M: 9.44%
• YTD: 14.24%
• 1Y: 16.34%
• 3Y*: 14.89%
• 5Y*: 8.25%
• 10Y*: 11.36%
• ALL TIME*: 12.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MACGX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MACGX vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MACGX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A	-3.13%	13.71%	42.06%	46.30%	-63.51%	-12.84%	142.01%	39.41%	11.85%	38.99%
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund	14.24%	10.58%	15.55%	17.20%	-17.27%	22.56%	17.13%	30.53%	-9.38%	18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MACGX and FSMDX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011	0.72

The correlation between MACGX and FSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MACGX vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MACGX

MACGX Risk / Return Rank: 2
MACGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
MACGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
MACGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
MACGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MACGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

FSMDX

FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 51
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MACGX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A (MACGX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MACGX	FSMDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.38	1.25	-1.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.35	1.86	-2.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.22	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.40	2.10	-2.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.79	7.99	-8.78

MACGX vs. FSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MACGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the FSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MACGX and FSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MACGX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MACGX drawdown since its inception was -77.61%, which is greater than FSMDX's maximum drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MACGX and FSMDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MACGX	FSMDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.61%	-40.35%	-37.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.55%	-8.16%	-19.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.55%	-20.92%	-7.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.61%	-26.07%	-51.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.61%	-40.35%	-37.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.15%	-1.17%	-44.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.73%	-4.91%	-20.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.80%	2.14%	+11.66%

Volatility

MACGX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A (MACGX) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) at 2.46%. This indicates that MACGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MACGX	FSMDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.84%	2.46%	+4.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.01%	10.16%	+11.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.96%	13.67%	+15.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.39%	18.25%	+30.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.45%	19.26%	+20.19%

MACGX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MACGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

MACGX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison

MACGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund	0.76%	1.10%	2.46%	1.39%	2.07%	3.35%	2.34%	2.86%	2.21%	2.17%	2.23%	2.84%
MACGX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	52.53%	9.95%	15.34%	29.46%	48.48%	75.72%	14.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MACGX and FSMDX in my portfolio?

MACGX and FSMDX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MACGX or FSMDX?

MACGX has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to FSMDX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MACGX dropped -77.61% vs FSMDX's -40.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.