MACGX vs. FBGRX

In the year-to-date period, MACGX achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's -0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, MACGX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of -8.73%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.67% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

MACGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A (MACGX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MACGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MACGX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MACGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.

The maximum MACGX drawdown since its inception was -85.92%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MACGX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A (MACGX) has a higher volatility of 8.49% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 6.06%. This indicates that MACGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.