PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEMUX vs. MSEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEMUX vs. MSEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (TEMUX) and Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEMUX achieves a 28.37% return, which is significantly higher than MSEQX's -1.20% return. Over the past 10 years, TEMUX has underperformed MSEQX with an annualized return of 9.29%, while MSEQX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.37% annualized return.


TEMUX

1D
0.99%
1M
9.76%
YTD
28.37%
6M
31.24%
1Y
57.52%
3Y*
23.94%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
9.29%

MSEQX

1D
-1.57%
1M
4.10%
YTD
-1.20%
6M
-2.94%
1Y
9.09%
3Y*
29.17%
5Y*
1.84%
10Y*
17.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEMUX vs. MSEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEMUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund
28.37%34.68%5.47%9.87%-21.75%-3.50%11.18%22.44%-18.73%39.16%
MSEQX
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I
-1.20%24.78%46.65%50.36%-60.18%-0.00%115.60%38.25%5.38%43.91%

Correlation

The correlation between TEMUX and MSEQX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1995

0.53

The correlation between TEMUX and MSEQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEMUX vs. MSEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEMUX
TEMUX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
TEMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TEMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

MSEQX
MSEQX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MSEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MSEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEMUX vs. MSEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (TEMUX) and Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEMUXMSEQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.08

+0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.14

0.35

+4.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.34

0.76

+18.58

TEMUX vs. MSEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEMUX Sharpe Ratio is 3.94, which is higher than the MSEQX Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEMUX and MSEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEMUXMSEQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.94

0.35

+3.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.05

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.52

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.47

-0.19

Drawdowns

TEMUX vs. MSEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEMUX drawdown since its inception was -68.20%, roughly equal to the maximum MSEQX drawdown of -69.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMUX and MSEQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEMUXMSEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.20%

-69.48%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.10%

-27.73%

+14.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.86%

-32.52%

+15.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.67%

-69.48%

+30.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.17%

-69.48%

+29.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-13.64%

+13.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.84%

-16.89%

-4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

12.82%

-9.54%

Volatility

TEMUX vs. MSEQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (TEMUX) is 7.17%, while Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that TEMUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEMUXMSEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.17%

8.13%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

21.32%

-7.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.11%

27.99%

-10.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

39.71%

-22.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.75%

33.76%

-16.01%

TEMUX vs. MSEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEMUX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than MSEQX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEMUX vs. MSEQX - Dividend Comparison

TEMUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, while MSEQX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSEQX
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I
0.00%0.00%0.55%0.05%16.79%24.24%9.36%21.39%5.38%21.18%12.71%7.55%
TEMUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund
1.89%2.43%2.09%2.41%1.92%4.47%1.96%1.81%1.67%1.26%1.10%1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEMUX and MSEQX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSEQX has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to TEMUX (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEMUX dropped -68.20% vs MSEQX's -69.48%.

TEMUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEMUX and MSEQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer