PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEMUX vs. MSEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TEMUX vs. MSEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (TEMUX) and Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TEMUX vs. MSEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEMUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund
2.63%34.68%5.47%9.87%-21.75%-3.50%11.18%22.44%-18.73%39.16%
MSEQX
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I
-15.37%24.78%46.65%50.36%-60.18%-0.00%115.60%38.25%5.38%43.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEMUX achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly higher than MSEQX's -15.37% return. Over the past 10 years, TEMUX has underperformed MSEQX with an annualized return of 7.16%, while MSEQX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.71% annualized return.


TEMUX

1D
1.93%
1M
-9.28%
YTD
2.63%
6M
7.80%
1Y
32.54%
3Y*
15.21%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
7.16%

MSEQX

1D
4.54%
1M
-4.30%
YTD
-15.37%
6M
-21.98%
1Y
15.92%
3Y*
25.56%
5Y*
-1.63%
10Y*
15.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TEMUX vs. MSEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEMUX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than MSEQX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TEMUX vs. MSEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEMUX
TEMUX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TEMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
TEMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

MSEQX
MSEQX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MSEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MSEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEMUX vs. MSEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (TEMUX) and Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEMUXMSEQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

0.55

+1.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.84

1.01

+1.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.12

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

0.58

+1.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.99

1.53

+7.46

TEMUX vs. MSEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEMUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the MSEQX Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEMUX and MSEQX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEMUXMSEQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

0.55

+1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

-0.04

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.47

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.46

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between TEMUX and MSEQX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

TEMUX vs. MSEQX - Dividend Comparison

TEMUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, while MSEQX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TEMUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund
2.36%2.43%2.09%2.41%1.92%4.47%1.96%1.81%1.67%1.26%1.10%1.44%
MSEQX
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I
0.00%0.00%0.55%0.05%16.79%24.24%9.36%21.39%5.38%21.18%12.71%7.55%

Drawdowns

TEMUX vs. MSEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEMUX drawdown since its inception was -68.20%, roughly equal to the maximum MSEQX drawdown of -69.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMUX and MSEQX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TEMUXMSEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.20%

-69.48%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.10%

-27.73%

+14.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.67%

-69.48%

+30.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.17%

-69.48%

+29.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.43%

-26.02%

+14.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.95%

-16.88%

-5.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

10.55%

-6.88%

Volatility

TEMUX vs. MSEQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (TEMUX) is 7.82%, while Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) has a volatility of 9.47%. This indicates that TEMUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TEMUXMSEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.82%

9.47%

-1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.80%

22.11%

-10.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.74%

33.39%

-14.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

39.78%

-22.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.57%

33.59%

-16.02%