PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MACAX vs. MURNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MACAX vs. MURNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mutual of America Conservative Allocation Fund (MACAX) and Mutual of America Investment Corporation - 2050 Retirement Fund (MURNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MACAX achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly lower than MURNX's 9.94% return.


MACAX

1D
0.57%
1M
0.81%
YTD
4.56%
6M
4.39%
1Y
12.42%
3Y*
8.87%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*

MURNX

1D
0.98%
1M
1.59%
YTD
9.94%
6M
9.33%
1Y
24.12%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MACAX vs. MURNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MACAX
Mutual of America Conservative Allocation Fund
4.56%11.09%6.84%8.97%-12.93%5.77%897.64%
MURNX
Mutual of America Investment Corporation - 2050 Retirement Fund
9.94%17.89%14.37%15.78%-16.25%17.85%1,020.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MACAX and MURNX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020

0.89

The correlation between MACAX and MURNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MACAX vs. MURNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MACAX
MACAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
MACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
MACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

MURNX
MURNX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MURNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MURNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MURNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MURNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MURNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MACAX vs. MURNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mutual of America Conservative Allocation Fund (MACAX) and Mutual of America Investment Corporation - 2050 Retirement Fund (MURNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MACAXMURNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.40

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.15

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.17

14.66

-0.49

MACAX vs. MURNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MACAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the MURNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MACAX and MURNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MACAX vs. MURNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MACAX drawdown since its inception was -17.36%, smaller than the maximum MURNX drawdown of -32.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MACAX and MURNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MACAXMURNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.36%

-32.96%

+15.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.63%

-8.50%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.65%

-15.36%

+8.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.36%

-23.75%

+6.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.23%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.25%

-5.47%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

1.75%

-0.81%

Volatility

MACAX vs. MURNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mutual of America Conservative Allocation Fund (MACAX) is 2.38%, while Mutual of America Investment Corporation - 2050 Retirement Fund (MURNX) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that MACAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MURNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MACAXMURNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

4.04%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.14%

9.73%

-4.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.19%

12.13%

-5.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.86%

17.28%

-8.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

393.59%

380.10%

+13.49%

MACAX vs. MURNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MACAX and MURNX have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MACAX vs. MURNX - Dividend Comparison

MACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, less than MURNX's 8.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MACAX
Mutual of America Conservative Allocation Fund
6.88%7.19%4.33%1.83%7.35%4.06%
MURNX
Mutual of America Investment Corporation - 2050 Retirement Fund
8.46%9.30%6.49%3.56%11.26%3.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, MACAX and MURNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MURNX has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to MACAX (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MACAX dropped -17.36% vs MURNX's -32.96%.

MACAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MACAX and MURNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer