PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MACAX vs. MACHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MACAX vs. MACHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mutual of America Conservative Allocation Fund (MACAX) and Mutual of America Composite Fund (MACHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MACAX vs. MACHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MACAX
Mutual of America Conservative Allocation Fund
-2.45%11.09%6.84%8.97%-12.93%5.77%897.64%
MACHX
Mutual of America Composite Fund
-2.83%18.88%16.49%14.56%-12.57%14.64%952.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MACAX achieves a -2.45% return, which is significantly higher than MACHX's -2.83% return.


MACAX

1D
-0.60%
1M
-4.55%
YTD
-2.45%
6M
-0.79%
1Y
7.61%
3Y*
6.74%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*

MACHX

1D
-1.04%
1M
-5.88%
YTD
-2.83%
6M
0.03%
1Y
15.75%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MACAX vs. MACHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MACAX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than MACHX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MACAX vs. MACHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MACAX
MACAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
MACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
MACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

MACHX
MACHX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MACHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MACHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MACHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MACHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MACHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MACAX vs. MACHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mutual of America Conservative Allocation Fund (MACAX) and Mutual of America Composite Fund (MACHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MACAXMACHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

1.58

-0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.83

2.32

-0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

1.26

-0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.86

5.51

-0.65

MACAX vs. MACHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MACAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the MACHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MACAX and MACHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MACAXMACHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.58

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.73

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.17

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between MACAX and MACHX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MACAX vs. MACHX - Dividend Comparison

MACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, less than MACHX's 12.09% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
MACAX
Mutual of America Conservative Allocation Fund
7.37%7.19%4.33%1.83%7.35%4.06%
MACHX
Mutual of America Composite Fund
12.09%11.75%8.06%6.00%6.23%3.64%

Drawdowns

MACAX vs. MACHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MACAX drawdown since its inception was -17.36%, smaller than the maximum MACHX drawdown of -21.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MACAX and MACHX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MACAXMACHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.36%

-21.24%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.76%

-7.49%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.36%

-18.57%

+1.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.63%

-6.17%

+1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-4.27%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

2.25%

-0.93%

Volatility

MACAX vs. MACHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mutual of America Conservative Allocation Fund (MACAX) is 1.84%, while Mutual of America Composite Fund (MACHX) has a volatility of 2.38%. This indicates that MACAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MACHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MACAXMACHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.84%

2.38%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.15%

6.34%

-2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.03%

11.52%

-4.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.79%

12.75%

-3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

402.11%

384.75%

+17.36%