PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MACAX vs. MARMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MACAX vs. MARMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mutual of America Conservative Allocation Fund (MACAX) and Mutual of America Retirement Income Fund (MARMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MACAX achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly higher than MARMX's 3.75% return.


MACAX

1D
0.16%
1M
2.48%
YTD
4.90%
6M
5.14%
1Y
13.17%
3Y*
9.09%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*

MARMX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.93%
YTD
3.75%
6M
3.95%
1Y
11.47%
3Y*
8.00%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MACAX vs. MARMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MACAX
Mutual of America Conservative Allocation Fund
4.90%11.09%6.84%8.97%-12.93%5.77%897.64%
MARMX
Mutual of America Retirement Income Fund
3.75%10.54%5.88%7.79%-11.40%3.49%890.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MACAX and MARMX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2020

0.95

The correlation between MACAX and MARMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MACAX vs. MARMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MACAX
MACAX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
MACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
MACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
MACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
MACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

MARMX
MARMX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MARMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MARMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MACAX vs. MARMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mutual of America Conservative Allocation Fund (MACAX) and Mutual of America Retirement Income Fund (MARMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MACAXMARMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.49

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

3.29

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.64

15.05

+0.59

MACAX vs. MARMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MACAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the MARMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MACAX and MARMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MACAXMARMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.54

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.48

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.15

0.00

Drawdowns

MACAX vs. MARMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MACAX drawdown since its inception was -17.36%, which is greater than MARMX's maximum drawdown of -16.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MACAX and MARMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MACAXMARMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.36%

-16.21%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.63%

-3.92%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.65%

-5.64%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.36%

-15.94%

-1.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-4.28%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.82%

+0.09%

Volatility

MACAX vs. MARMX - Volatility Comparison

Mutual of America Conservative Allocation Fund (MACAX) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to Mutual of America Retirement Income Fund (MARMX) at 1.76%. This indicates that MACAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MARMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MACAXMARMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

1.76%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.86%

4.13%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.86%

5.08%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.82%

7.53%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

395.52%

393.36%

+2.16%

MACAX vs. MARMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MACAX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than MARMX's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MACAX vs. MARMX - Dividend Comparison

MACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%, more than MARMX's 4.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MACAX
Mutual of America Conservative Allocation Fund
6.86%7.19%4.33%1.83%7.35%4.06%
MARMX
Mutual of America Retirement Income Fund
4.16%4.32%4.16%1.55%5.73%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, MACAX and MARMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MACAX has higher volatility (1.97%) compared to MARMX (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MACAX dropped -17.36% vs MARMX's -16.21%.

MACAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MACAX and MARMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer