MABAX vs. FFANX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MABAX (BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund) and FFANX (Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund) are both mutual funds - MABAX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while FFANX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, MABAX returned 11.40%/yr vs 6.99%/yr for FFANX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MABAX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for FFANX.

Performance

MABAX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund (MABAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MABAX achieves a 9.40% return, which is significantly higher than FFANX's 7.45% return. Over the past 10 years, MABAX has outperformed FFANX with an annualized return of 11.40%, while FFANX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.99% annualized return.

MABAX

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 3.11%
• YTD: 9.40%
• 6M: 9.18%
• 1Y: 27.84%
• 3Y*: 18.24%
• 5Y*: 11.68%
• 10Y*: 11.40%

FFANX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.41%
• YTD: 7.45%
• 6M: 7.31%
• 1Y: 16.42%
• 3Y*: 11.28%
• 5Y*: 5.36%
• 10Y*: 6.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MABAX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MABAX BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund	9.40%	25.33%	10.30%	16.22%	-4.59%	21.48%	3.48%	24.17%	-7.63%	6.74%
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund	7.45%	13.16%	7.40%	11.52%	-13.62%	8.03%	13.10%	15.81%	-4.06%	11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MABAX and FFANX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2007	0.82

The correlation between MABAX and FFANX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MABAX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MABAX

MABAX Risk / Return Rank: 59
MABAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
MABAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
MABAX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
MABAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
MABAX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FFANX

FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 79
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MABAX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund (MABAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MABAX	FFANX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.41	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	3.45	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.47	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	3.27	-0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.21	13.95	-3.74

MABAX vs. FFANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MABAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the FFANX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MABAX and FFANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MABAX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MABAX drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than FFANX's maximum drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MABAX and FFANX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MABAX	FFANX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.63%	-31.69%	-22.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.19%	-5.20%	-5.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.46%	-7.55%	-7.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.15%	-18.52%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.44%	-18.52%	-20.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.55%	-0.13%	-1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.44%	-3.79%	-2.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	1.22%	+1.60%

Volatility

MABAX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund (MABAX) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) at 2.94%. This indicates that MABAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MABAX	FFANX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	2.94%	+1.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.24%	6.01%	+4.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.88%	7.09%	+5.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.86%	7.94%	+7.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.41%	7.74%	+10.67%

MABAX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MABAX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

MABAX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison

MABAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.40%, more than FFANX's 3.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund	3.65%	3.97%	2.81%	2.49%	5.75%	2.35%	2.36%	3.67%	4.56%	2.56%	1.43%	3.18%
MABAX BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund	13.40%	14.66%	9.18%	4.84%	11.41%	18.17%	12.42%	12.76%	29.20%	3.10%	1.46%	14.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MABAX and FFANX in my portfolio?

MABAX and FFANX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MABAX or FFANX?

MABAX has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to FFANX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MABAX dropped -54.63% vs FFANX's -31.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.