MABAX vs. HFCVX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund (MABAX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX).
MABAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jul 1, 1977. HFCVX is managed by Hennessy. It was launched on Nov 1, 1996.
Performance
MABAX vs. HFCVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MABAX vs. HFCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MABAX BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund | -5.86% | 25.33% | 10.30% | 16.22% | -4.59% | 21.48% | 3.48% | 24.17% | -7.63% | 6.74% |
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund | 8.31% | 18.27% | 9.59% | 5.81% | 6.12% | 29.94% | -6.39% | 20.84% | -9.50% | 19.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MABAX achieves a -5.86% return, which is significantly lower than HFCVX's 8.31% return. Over the past 10 years, MABAX has underperformed HFCVX with an annualized return of 9.86%, while HFCVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.76% annualized return.
MABAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -9.42%
- YTD
- -5.86%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 14.21%
- 3Y*
- 13.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
HFCVX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- 8.31%
- 6M
- 12.62%
- 1Y
- 17.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MABAX vs. HFCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MABAX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MABAX vs. HFCVX — Risk / Return Rank
MABAX
HFCVX
MABAX vs. HFCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund (MABAX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MABAX | HFCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 1.46 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 1.97 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.30 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 1.57 | -0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.16 | 6.83 | -2.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MABAX | HFCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.46 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.93 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.65 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.40 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between MABAX and HFCVX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MABAX vs. HFCVX - Dividend Comparison
MABAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.57%, more than HFCVX's 6.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MABAX BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund | 15.57% | 14.66% | 9.18% | 4.84% | 11.41% | 18.17% | 12.42% | 12.76% | 29.20% | 3.10% | 1.46% | 14.94% |
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund | 6.83% | 7.39% | 4.56% | 3.57% | 10.33% | 4.81% | 2.58% | 6.58% | 17.16% | 14.97% | 2.26% | 2.57% |
Drawdowns
MABAX vs. HFCVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MABAX drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum HFCVX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MABAX and HFCVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MABAX | HFCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -65.75% | +11.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.76% | -11.00% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.15% | -16.81% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.44% | -39.39% | -0.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.19% | -2.27% | -8.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.46% | -8.28% | +1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 2.60% | +0.55% |
Volatility
MABAX vs. HFCVX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund (MABAX) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) at 2.92%. This indicates that MABAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MABAX | HFCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 2.92% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 6.80% | +2.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 12.75% | +4.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 13.27% | +2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.40% | 16.48% | +1.92% |