PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MA vs. RTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MA vs. RTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and RTX Corporation (RTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MA achieves a -13.89% return, which is significantly lower than RTX's 0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, MA has outperformed RTX with an annualized return of 18.64%, while RTX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.68% annualized return.


MA

1D
0.71%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
-13.89%
6M
-14.05%
1Y
-16.36%
3Y*
10.32%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
18.64%

RTX

1D
-0.37%
1M
3.47%
YTD
0.82%
6M
3.50%
1Y
32.26%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
18.20%
10Y*
15.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MA vs. RTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
-13.89%9.04%24.17%23.40%-2.66%1.16%20.19%59.16%25.31%47.69%
RTX
RTX Corporation
0.82%61.44%40.76%-14.44%20.01%23.27%-7.70%43.82%-14.66%19.13%

Correlation

The correlation between MA and RTX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2006

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between MA and RTX has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MA:

$437.55B

RTX:

$250.45B

EPS

MA:

$17.28

RTX:

$5.34

PE Ratio

MA:

28.36

RTX:

34.39

PEG Ratio

MA:

1.65

RTX:

1.37

PS Ratio

MA:

13.01

RTX:

2.76

PB Ratio

MA:

65.09

RTX:

3.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

MA:

$33.94B

RTX:

$90.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MA:

$26.70B

RTX:

$18.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

MA:

$21.23B

RTX:

$13.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MA vs. RTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MA
MA Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MA Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MA Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

RTX
RTX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
RTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
RTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MA vs. RTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and RTX Corporation (RTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MARTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.25

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

1.68

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.59

4.55

-6.14

MA vs. RTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MA Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the RTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MA and RTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MA vs. RTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MA drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, which is greater than RTX's maximum drawdown of -55.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MA and RTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MARTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.67%

-55.14%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.91%

-19.32%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-29.48%

+8.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.25%

-32.84%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.00%

-51.98%

+10.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.82%

-13.13%

-4.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.82%

-13.03%

+3.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.48%

7.10%

+3.38%

Volatility

MA vs. RTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is 6.46%, while RTX Corporation (RTX) has a volatility of 8.72%. This indicates that MA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MARTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.46%

8.72%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.51%

18.40%

-0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.34%

24.26%

-1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.01%

23.94%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.92%

27.77%

-0.85%

Dividends

MA vs. RTX - Dividend Comparison

MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than RTX's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
0.67%0.53%0.50%0.53%0.56%0.49%0.45%0.44%0.53%0.58%0.74%0.66%
RTX
RTX Corporation
1.51%1.46%2.14%2.76%2.14%2.33%21.21%1.96%2.66%2.13%2.39%2.66%

Financials

MA vs. RTX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mastercard Incorporated and RTX Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
8.40B
22.08B
(MA) Total Revenue
(RTX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MA vs. RTX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mastercard Incorporated and RTX Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
58.4%
20.8%
Portfolio components
MA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a gross profit of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

RTX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RTX Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.59B and revenue of 22.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.8%.

MA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported an operating income of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.4%.

RTX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RTX Corporation reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 22.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

MA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a net income of 3.88B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 46.2%.

RTX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RTX Corporation reported a net income of 2.06B and revenue of 22.08B, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MA and RTX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RTX has higher volatility (8.72%) compared to MA (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MA dropped -62.67% vs RTX's -55.14%.

RTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MA and RTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer