PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTX vs. LHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RTX vs. LHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RTX Corporation (RTX) and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTX achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than LHX's -1.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RTX having a 15.84% annualized return and LHX not far behind at 15.59%.


RTX

1D
-2.03%
1M
2.72%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
-1.34%
1Y
25.97%
3Y*
25.98%
5Y*
18.57%
10Y*
15.84%

LHX

1D
-3.05%
1M
-8.01%
YTD
-1.90%
6M
-2.41%
1Y
16.34%
3Y*
16.48%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
15.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTX vs. LHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RTX
RTX Corporation
-0.11%61.44%40.76%-14.44%20.01%23.27%-7.70%43.82%-14.66%19.13%
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
-1.90%42.28%1.88%3.67%-0.48%14.98%-2.76%49.21%-3.38%40.80%

Correlation

The correlation between RTX and LHX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1981

0.39

Over the past year, RTX and LHX have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

RTX:

$5.34

LHX:

$12.29

PE Ratio

RTX:

34.07

LHX:

23.26

PEG Ratio

RTX:

1.35

LHX:

11.93

PS Ratio

RTX:

2.74

LHX:

1.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

RTX:

$90.37B

LHX:

$22.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RTX:

$18.27B

LHX:

$5.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

RTX:

$13.81B

LHX:

$3.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTX vs. LHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTX
RTX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
RTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
RTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

LHX
LHX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
LHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
LHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
LHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTX vs. LHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RTX Corporation (RTX) and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RTXLHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.13

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

0.69

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.58

1.96

+1.62

RTX vs. LHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the LHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTX and LHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RTX vs. LHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTX drawdown since its inception was -55.14%, smaller than the maximum LHX drawdown of -69.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTX and LHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTXLHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.14%

-69.82%

+14.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.32%

-23.91%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.99%

-25.98%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.84%

-38.16%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.98%

-38.16%

-13.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.94%

-23.91%

+9.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.03%

-21.33%

+8.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.28%

8.35%

-1.07%

Volatility

RTX vs. LHX - Volatility Comparison

RTX Corporation (RTX) and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) have volatilities of 9.46% and 9.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTXLHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.46%

9.77%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.94%

20.93%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.59%

25.23%

-0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.03%

24.16%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.84%

25.55%

+2.29%

Dividends

RTX vs. LHX - Dividend Comparison

RTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than LHX's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
1.71%1.64%2.21%2.17%2.15%1.91%1.80%1.45%1.86%1.55%2.01%2.23%
RTX
RTX Corporation
1.52%1.46%2.14%2.76%2.14%2.33%21.21%1.96%2.66%2.13%2.39%2.66%

Financials

RTX vs. LHX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RTX Corporation and L3Harris Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
22.08B
5.74B
(RTX) Total Revenue
(LHX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RTX vs. LHX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RTX Corporation and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
20.8%
24.4%
Portfolio components
RTX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RTX Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.59B and revenue of 22.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.8%.

LHX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.40B and revenue of 5.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.

RTX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RTX Corporation reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 22.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

LHX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 652.00M and revenue of 5.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.

RTX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RTX Corporation reported a net income of 2.06B and revenue of 22.08B, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.

LHX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 512.00M and revenue of 5.74B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RTX and LHX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LHX has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to RTX (9.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTX dropped -55.14% vs LHX's -69.82%.

RTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTX and LHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer