PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
M9SD.DE vs. G2XJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

M9SD.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (M9SD.DE) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, M9SD.DE achieves a 3.74% return, which is significantly higher than G2XJ.DE's -3.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with M9SD.DE having a 12.24% annualized return and G2XJ.DE not far ahead at 12.60%.


M9SD.DE

1D
1.07%
1M
-4.44%
YTD
3.74%
6M
11.23%
1Y
69.16%
3Y*
40.66%
5Y*
20.23%
10Y*
12.24%

G2XJ.DE

1D
0.42%
1M
-7.94%
YTD
-3.74%
6M
7.08%
1Y
60.21%
3Y*
42.43%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
12.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

M9SD.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
M9SD.DE
Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF
3.74%130.74%20.64%2.95%-2.13%-8.52%14.07%50.51%-13.27%-11.82%
G2XJ.DE
VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS
-3.74%149.58%21.45%3.64%-6.09%-15.55%18.76%43.18%-8.98%-10.97%

Correlation

The correlation between M9SD.DE and G2XJ.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015

0.92

The correlation between M9SD.DE and G2XJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

M9SD.DE vs. G2XJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

M9SD.DE
M9SD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
M9SD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
M9SD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
M9SD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
M9SD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
M9SD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

G2XJ.DE
G2XJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
G2XJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

M9SD.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (M9SD.DE) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


M9SD.DEG2XJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.11

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.47

5.07

+1.40

M9SD.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current M9SD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the G2XJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of M9SD.DE and G2XJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


M9SD.DEG2XJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.33

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.50

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.33

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.39

-0.26

Drawdowns

M9SD.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum M9SD.DE drawdown since its inception was -80.12%, which is greater than G2XJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -49.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for M9SD.DE and G2XJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


M9SD.DEG2XJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.12%

-49.96%

-30.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.35%

-29.24%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.35%

-29.24%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.62%

-40.82%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.80%

-49.96%

-5.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.37%

-25.97%

+3.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.59%

-25.26%

-17.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.84%

12.16%

-1.32%

Volatility

M9SD.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (M9SD.DE) is 13.40%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) has a volatility of 15.07%. This indicates that M9SD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G2XJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


M9SD.DEG2XJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.40%

15.07%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.87%

38.04%

-4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.57%

46.48%

-3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.36%

36.98%

-2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.73%

37.69%

-2.96%

M9SD.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

M9SD.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than G2XJ.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

M9SD.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither M9SD.DE nor G2XJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, M9SD.DE and G2XJ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, G2XJ.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

G2XJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for M9SD.DE.

M9SD.DE tracks NYSE Arca Gold BUGS, while G2XJ.DE tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners. They also come from different issuers: China Post Global and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for M9SD.DE and 0.55% for G2XJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for M9SD.DE and G2XJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer