M37R.DE vs. DR7E.DE
M37R.DE (HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF) and DR7E.DE (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Technology Equities funds - M37R.DE tracks the Solactive ETC Group Global Metaverse while DR7E.DE tracks the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, M37R.DE returned -5.22% vs 85.24% for DR7E.DE. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. M37R.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DR7E.DE.
Performance
M37R.DE vs. DR7E.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, M37R.DE achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than DR7E.DE's 41.08% return.
M37R.DE
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- -6.38%
- 6M
- -12.87%
- 1Y
- -5.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DR7E.DE
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 9.59%
- YTD
- 41.08%
- 6M
- 40.29%
- 1Y
- 85.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
M37R.DE vs. DR7E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
M37R.DE HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF | -6.38% | -10.17% | 28.74% |
DR7E.DE Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 41.08% | 15.37% | 8.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between M37R.DE and DR7E.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.66 |
The correlation between M37R.DE and DR7E.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
M37R.DE vs. DR7E.DE — Risk / Return Rank
M37R.DE
DR7E.DE
M37R.DE vs. DR7E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DR7E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| M37R.DE | DR7E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.57 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 8.52 | -8.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 24.61 | -24.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| M37R.DE | DR7E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 | 3.67 | -3.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.29 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
M37R.DE vs. DR7E.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum M37R.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.85%, roughly equal to the maximum DR7E.DE drawdown of -40.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for M37R.DE and DR7E.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| M37R.DE | DR7E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.85% | -40.66% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.85% | -9.95% | -28.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.62% | -2.08% | -22.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.24% | -18.33% | +4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.99% | 3.45% | +15.54% |
Volatility
M37R.DE vs. DR7E.DE - Volatility Comparison
HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.35% compared to Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DR7E.DE) at 9.64%. This indicates that M37R.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DR7E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| M37R.DE | DR7E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.35% | 9.64% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.98% | 16.91% | +4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.65% | 23.14% | +5.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.04% | 25.01% | +7.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.04% | 25.01% | +7.03% |
M37R.DE vs. DR7E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
M37R.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DR7E.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
M37R.DE vs. DR7E.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither M37R.DE nor DR7E.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
M37R.DE and DR7E.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DR7E.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DR7E.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for M37R.DE.
M37R.DE tracks Solactive ETC Group Global Metaverse, while DR7E.DE tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for M37R.DE and 0.50% for DR7E.DE.
Find the right allocation for M37R.DE and DR7E.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer