PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LZUSX vs. LZEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LZUSX vs. LZEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LZUSX vs. LZEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LZUSX
Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio
-5.22%15.23%14.20%19.79%-16.97%27.40%17.28%31.71%-3.36%18.18%
LZEMX
Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio
6.61%41.35%7.60%22.44%-14.86%5.37%-0.07%18.06%-18.11%28.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZUSX achieves a -5.22% return, which is significantly lower than LZEMX's 6.61% return. Over the past 10 years, LZUSX has outperformed LZEMX with an annualized return of 11.73%, while LZEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.39% annualized return.


LZUSX

1D
2.27%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
-5.22%
6M
-1.37%
1Y
13.42%
3Y*
12.61%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
11.73%

LZEMX

1D
1.54%
1M
-7.29%
YTD
6.61%
6M
16.90%
1Y
40.50%
3Y*
22.54%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
9.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LZUSX vs. LZEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZUSX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than LZEMX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LZUSX vs. LZEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LZUSX
LZUSX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
LZUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LZUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

LZEMX
LZEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LZEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LZEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LZUSX vs. LZEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LZUSXLZEMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

2.95

-2.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

3.72

-2.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.57

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

3.86

-2.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.75

14.21

-9.46

LZUSX vs. LZEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZUSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the LZEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZUSX and LZEMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LZUSXLZEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

2.95

-2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.78

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.58

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.39

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between LZUSX and LZEMX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LZUSX vs. LZEMX - Dividend Comparison

LZUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.57%, more than LZEMX's 1.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LZUSX
Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio
14.57%13.81%6.61%1.09%2.77%5.78%5.28%11.94%17.57%10.34%3.41%7.83%
LZEMX
Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio
1.92%2.05%3.11%3.76%5.92%4.89%2.11%2.45%2.10%1.99%1.48%2.14%

Drawdowns

LZUSX vs. LZEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZUSX drawdown since its inception was -55.40%, smaller than the maximum LZEMX drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZUSX and LZEMX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LZUSXLZEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.40%

-60.08%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-10.42%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.05%

-30.55%

+7.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-44.08%

+8.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.55%

-9.04%

+1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-16.71%

+8.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.89%

+0.10%

Volatility

LZUSX vs. LZEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX) is 4.50%, while Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that LZUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LZEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LZUSXLZEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

6.23%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

9.72%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.10%

14.30%

+3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

14.11%

+2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.70%

16.34%

+1.36%