LZUSX vs. ICMPX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LZUSX (Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio) and ICMPX (Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio) are both mutual funds - LZUSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Lazard, while ICMPX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Lazard. Over the past 5 years, LZUSX returned 8.53%/yr vs 1.16%/yr for ICMPX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LZUSX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ICMPX.

Performance

LZUSX vs. ICMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX) and Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio (ICMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZUSX achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly higher than ICMPX's -4.68% return.

LZUSX

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: 4.32%
• 6M: 3.51%
• 1Y: 18.70%
• 3Y*: 14.66%
• 5Y*: 8.53%
• 10Y*: 13.13%

ICMPX

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -1.99%
• YTD: -4.68%
• 6M: -5.13%
• 1Y: -2.40%
• 3Y*: 6.30%
• 5Y*: 1.16%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LZUSX vs. ICMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LZUSX Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio	4.32%	15.23%	14.20%	19.79%	-16.97%	27.40%	17.28%	31.71%
ICMPX Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio	-4.68%	11.70%	5.62%	17.84%	-20.11%	10.02%	23.95%	32.86%

Correlation

The correlation between LZUSX and ICMPX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019	0.76

The correlation between LZUSX and ICMPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LZUSX vs. ICMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LZUSX

LZUSX Risk / Return Rank: 37
LZUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
LZUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
LZUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
LZUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
LZUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

ICMPX

ICMPX Risk / Return Rank: 2
ICMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
ICMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
ICMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
ICMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
ICMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LZUSX vs. ICMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX) and Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio (ICMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LZUSX	ICMPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	-0.08	+1.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	-0.02	+2.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.00	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	-0.07	+2.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.91	-0.20	+8.12

LZUSX vs. ICMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the ICMPX Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZUSX and ICMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LZUSX vs. ICMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZUSX drawdown since its inception was -55.40%, which is greater than ICMPX's maximum drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZUSX and ICMPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LZUSX	ICMPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.40%	-34.70%	-20.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.07%	-15.45%	+5.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.18%	-15.45%	-3.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.05%	-34.70%	+11.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.97%	-8.54%	+6.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.83%	-8.78%	+0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	5.65%	-3.16%

Volatility

LZUSX vs. ICMPX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX) and Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio (ICMPX) have volatilities of 4.01% and 4.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LZUSX	ICMPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.01%	4.03%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.87%	11.33%	-2.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.58%	14.01%	-2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.48%	16.42%	+0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.72%	17.62%	+0.10%

LZUSX vs. ICMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZUSX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than ICMPX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

LZUSX vs. ICMPX - Dividend Comparison

LZUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.24%, more than ICMPX's 4.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ICMPX Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio	4.56%	4.35%	2.92%	0.62%	1.07%	2.04%	0.87%	2.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LZUSX Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio	13.24%	13.81%	6.61%	1.09%	2.77%	5.78%	5.28%	11.94%	17.57%	10.34%	3.41%	7.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LZUSX and ICMPX in my portfolio?

LZUSX and ICMPX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LZUSX or ICMPX?

ICMPX has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to LZUSX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZUSX dropped -55.40% vs ICMPX's -34.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LZUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.