LZUSX vs. GLFOX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LZUSX (Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio) and GLFOX (Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares) are both mutual funds - LZUSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Lazard, while GLFOX is a Global Equities fund managed by Lazard. Over the past 10 years, LZUSX returned 12.83%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for GLFOX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LZUSX charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for GLFOX.

Performance

LZUSX vs. GLFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZUSX achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly lower than GLFOX's 7.26% return. Over the past 10 years, LZUSX has outperformed GLFOX with an annualized return of 12.83%, while GLFOX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.01% annualized return.

LZUSX

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 2.86%
• YTD: 5.70%
• 6M: 5.71%
• 1Y: 21.29%
• 3Y*: 15.39%
• 5Y*: 9.04%
• 10Y*: 12.83%

GLFOX

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -1.97%
• YTD: 7.26%
• 6M: 7.41%
• 1Y: 15.22%
• 3Y*: 13.64%
• 5Y*: 11.01%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LZUSX vs. GLFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LZUSX Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio	5.70%	15.23%	14.20%	19.79%	-16.97%	27.40%	17.28%	31.71%	-3.36%	18.18%
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares	7.26%	23.53%	6.43%	10.59%	-1.59%	19.67%	-4.71%	21.95%	-4.06%	20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between LZUSX and GLFOX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010	0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between LZUSX and GLFOX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LZUSX vs. GLFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LZUSX

LZUSX Risk / Return Rank: 41
LZUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
LZUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
LZUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
LZUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LZUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

GLFOX

GLFOX Risk / Return Rank: 23
GLFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
GLFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
GLFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
GLFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
GLFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LZUSX vs. GLFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LZUSX	GLFOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	1.43	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	1.94	+0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.27	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	1.70	+0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.84	5.74	+3.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LZUSX vs. GLFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the GLFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZUSX and GLFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LZUSX	GLFOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.97	1.43	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	1.01	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.75	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.82	-0.33

Drawdowns

LZUSX vs. GLFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZUSX drawdown since its inception was -55.40%, which is greater than GLFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZUSX and GLFOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LZUSX	GLFOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.40%	-29.65%	-25.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.07%	-9.01%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.18%	-10.07%	-9.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.05%	-17.14%	-5.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.12%	-29.65%	-5.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-5.85%	+5.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.85%	-3.42%	-4.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.47%	2.67%	-0.20%

Volatility

LZUSX vs. GLFOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX) is 2.13%, while Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that LZUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LZUSX	GLFOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.13%	4.51%	-2.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.26%	9.32%	-1.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.14%	10.74%	+0.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.42%	11.00%	+5.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.69%	13.34%	+4.35%

LZUSX vs. GLFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZUSX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than GLFOX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

LZUSX vs. GLFOX - Dividend Comparison

LZUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.07%, more than GLFOX's 6.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares	6.10%	6.03%	4.00%	2.69%	14.50%	6.02%	2.39%	4.20%	13.99%	6.82%	2.07%	11.01%
LZUSX Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio	13.07%	13.81%	6.61%	1.09%	2.77%	5.78%	5.28%	11.94%	17.57%	10.34%	3.41%	7.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LZUSX and GLFOX in my portfolio?

LZUSX and GLFOX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LZUSX or GLFOX?

GLFOX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to LZUSX (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZUSX dropped -55.40% vs GLFOX's -29.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LZUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.