LZIEX vs. CEMIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LZIEX (Lazard International Equity Portfolio) and CEMIX (Causeway Emerging Markets Fund) are both mutual funds - LZIEX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Lazard, while CEMIX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Causeway. Over the past 10 years, LZIEX returned 8.24%/yr vs 12.27%/yr for CEMIX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LZIEX charges 0.82%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for CEMIX.

Performance

LZIEX vs. CEMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) and Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZIEX achieves a 10.51% return, which is significantly lower than CEMIX's 36.19% return. Over the past 10 years, LZIEX has underperformed CEMIX with an annualized return of 8.24%, while CEMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.27% annualized return.

LZIEX

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: 10.51%
• 6M: 10.57%
• 1Y: 24.74%
• 3Y*: 16.78%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: 8.24%

CEMIX

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: 7.48%
• YTD: 36.19%
• 6M: 38.69%
• 1Y: 65.86%
• 3Y*: 30.48%
• 5Y*: 12.43%
• 10Y*: 12.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LZIEX vs. CEMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LZIEX Lazard International Equity Portfolio	10.51%	34.14%	5.30%	16.49%	-15.00%	6.14%	8.76%	21.20%	-13.71%	22.82%
CEMIX Causeway Emerging Markets Fund	36.19%	36.22%	14.90%	17.13%	-23.05%	-0.83%	16.95%	16.73%	-17.91%	39.79%

Correlation

The correlation between LZIEX and CEMIX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2007	0.73

The correlation between LZIEX and CEMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LZIEX vs. CEMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LZIEX

LZIEX Risk / Return Rank: 34
LZIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
LZIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
LZIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
LZIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
LZIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

CEMIX

CEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 89
CEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
CEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LZIEX vs. CEMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) and Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LZIEX	CEMIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	2.90	-1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	3.45	-1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.53	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	4.84	-2.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.94	18.31	-11.37

LZIEX vs. CEMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the CEMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZIEX and CEMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LZIEX vs. CEMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZIEX drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, smaller than the maximum CEMIX drawdown of -68.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZIEX and CEMIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LZIEX	CEMIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.35%	-68.90%	+13.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.88%	-13.61%	+1.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.71%	-17.92%	+4.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.42%	-36.29%	+5.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.12%	-39.59%	+4.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-0.35%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.22%	-15.76%	+4.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	3.58%	-0.14%

Volatility

LZIEX vs. CEMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) is 5.20%, while Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX) has a volatility of 12.50%. This indicates that LZIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LZIEX	CEMIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	12.50%	-7.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.09%	20.35%	-8.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.54%	22.76%	-8.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.85%	18.35%	-2.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.14%	18.69%	-2.55%

LZIEX vs. CEMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZIEX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMIX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

LZIEX vs. CEMIX - Dividend Comparison

LZIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.18%, more than CEMIX's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEMIX Causeway Emerging Markets Fund	1.83%	2.49%	3.73%	4.85%	4.87%	23.35%	1.36%	2.03%	2.01%	1.58%	1.55%	1.69%
LZIEX Lazard International Equity Portfolio	11.18%	12.35%	8.26%	3.78%	6.12%	17.81%	1.03%	2.07%	7.93%	1.42%	1.06%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LZIEX and CEMIX in my portfolio?

LZIEX and CEMIX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LZIEX or CEMIX?

CEMIX has higher volatility (12.50%) compared to LZIEX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZIEX dropped -55.35% vs CEMIX's -68.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.