VUSA.L vs. VNRT.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) and Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L).
VUSA.L and VNRT.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VUSA.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on May 22, 2012. VNRT.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Sep 30, 2014. Both VUSA.L and VNRT.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VUSA.L or VNRT.L.
Correlation
The correlation between VUSA.L and VNRT.L is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VUSA.L vs. VNRT.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VUSA.L:
1.06
VNRT.L:
1.02
VUSA.L:
1.52
VNRT.L:
1.45
VUSA.L:
1.21
VNRT.L:
1.20
VUSA.L:
1.36
VNRT.L:
1.32
VUSA.L:
6.32
VNRT.L:
6.20
VUSA.L:
2.06%
VNRT.L:
2.03%
VUSA.L:
12.18%
VNRT.L:
12.26%
VUSA.L:
-25.47%
VNRT.L:
-26.17%
VUSA.L:
-8.99%
VNRT.L:
-9.09%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VUSA.L having a -4.75% return and VNRT.L slightly higher at -4.74%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VUSA.L having a 14.22% annualized return and VNRT.L not far ahead at 14.33%.
VUSA.L
-4.75%
-6.93%
8.33%
13.34%
16.15%
14.22%
VNRT.L
-4.74%
-7.19%
7.92%
12.84%
16.08%
14.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VUSA.L vs. VNRT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUSA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VNRT.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VUSA.L vs. VNRT.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
VUSA.L
VNRT.L
VUSA.L vs. VNRT.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) and Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VUSA.L vs. VNRT.L - Dividend Comparison
VUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than VNRT.L's 0.51% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 1.11% | 1.00% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.44% | 1.50% | 1.72% | 1.61% | 1.58% | 1.73% | 1.50% |
VNRT.L Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing | 0.54% | 0.49% | 1.25% | 1.41% | 1.02% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.75% | 1.61% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 0.35% |
Drawdowns
VUSA.L vs. VNRT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.47%, roughly equal to the maximum VNRT.L drawdown of -26.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSA.L and VNRT.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VUSA.L vs. VNRT.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) and Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) have volatilities of 4.56% and 4.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.