LYTS vs. AEHR
LYTS (LSI Industries Inc.) and AEHR (Aehr Test Systems) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — LYTS in Electronic Components, AEHR in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials. Over the past 10 years, LYTS returned 11.87%/yr vs 52.01%/yr for AEHR. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LYTS vs. AEHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYTS achieves a 42.76% return, which is significantly lower than AEHR's 461.32% return. Over the past 10 years, LYTS has underperformed AEHR with an annualized return of 11.87%, while AEHR has yielded a comparatively higher 52.01% annualized return.
LYTS
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- 11.95%
- YTD
- 42.76%
- 6M
- 39.78%
- 1Y
- 62.54%
- 3Y*
- 29.73%
- 5Y*
- 29.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
AEHR
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- 19.27%
- YTD
- 461.32%
- 6M
- 401.24%
- 1Y
- 916.41%
- 3Y*
- 41.56%
- 5Y*
- 113.08%
- 10Y*
- 52.01%
LYTS vs. AEHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYTS LSI Industries Inc. | 42.76% | -4.68% | 39.69% | 16.79% | 82.88% | -17.98% | 45.70% | 100.79% | -52.25% | -27.41% |
AEHR Aehr Test Systems | 461.32% | 21.41% | -37.32% | 31.99% | -16.87% | 855.73% | 26.50% | 41.84% | -47.97% | 12.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYTS and AEHR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 1997 | 0.14 |
Over the past year, LYTS and AEHR have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
LYTS:
$843.36M
AEHR:
$3.48B
LYTS:
$0.76
AEHR:
-$0.38
LYTS:
1.35
AEHR:
75.69
LYTS:
$609.84M
AEHR:
$45.26M
LYTS:
$156.38M
AEHR:
$13.90M
LYTS:
$39.60M
AEHR:
-$13.56M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYTS vs. AEHR — Risk / Return Rank
LYTS
AEHR
LYTS vs. AEHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) and Aehr Test Systems (AEHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LYTS | AEHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.54 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 21.88 | -19.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 49.20 | -44.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LYTS vs. AEHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYTS drawdown since its inception was -85.55%, smaller than the maximum AEHR drawdown of -97.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYTS and AEHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYTS | AEHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.55% | -97.98% | +12.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.42% | -42.31% | +14.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.60% | -87.37% | +46.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.60% | -87.37% | +46.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.17% | -87.37% | +11.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -2.79% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.19% | -79.54% | +41.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.22% | 18.78% | -6.56% |
Volatility
LYTS vs. AEHR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) is 12.58%, while Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) has a volatility of 38.11%. This indicates that LYTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYTS | AEHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.58% | 38.11% | -25.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.21% | 88.16% | -58.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.17% | 119.34% | -78.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.89% | 110.07% | -66.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.12% | 94.00% | -45.88% |
Dividends
LYTS vs. AEHR - Dividend Comparison
LYTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while AEHR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEHR Aehr Test Systems | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LYTS LSI Industries Inc. | 0.77% | 1.09% | 1.03% | 1.42% | 1.63% | 2.92% | 2.34% | 3.31% | 6.31% | 2.91% | 2.05% | 0.98% |
Financials
LYTS vs. AEHR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LSI Industries Inc. and Aehr Test Systems. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LYTS vs. AEHR - Profitability Comparison
LYTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSI Industries Inc. reported a gross profit of 39.72M and revenue of 150.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.4%.
AEHR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported a gross profit of 3.37M and revenue of 10.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.
LYTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSI Industries Inc. reported an operating income of 3.81M and revenue of 150.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.
AEHR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported an operating income of -4.23M and revenue of 10.31M, resulting in an operating margin of -41.0%.
LYTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSI Industries Inc. reported a net income of 2.09M and revenue of 150.53M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
AEHR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported a net income of -3.20M and revenue of 10.31M, resulting in a net margin of -31.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYTS and AEHR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AEHR has higher volatility (38.11%) compared to LYTS (12.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYTS dropped -85.55% vs AEHR's -97.98%.
AEHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.77 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LYTS and AEHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer