PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYTR.DE vs. EN4C.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYTR.DE vs. EN4C.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) and L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (EN4C.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYTR.DE achieves a 31.68% return, which is significantly higher than EN4C.DE's 24.44% return.


LYTR.DE

1D
-0.51%
1M
1.45%
YTD
31.68%
6M
37.89%
1Y
63.68%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
9.05%

EN4C.DE

1D
-1.57%
1M
0.45%
YTD
24.44%
6M
23.08%
1Y
29.56%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYTR.DE vs. EN4C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LYTR.DE
Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc
31.68%17.61%13.31%-15.11%27.05%8.56%
EN4C.DE
L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF
24.44%-3.13%9.93%-5.63%29.83%10.18%

Correlation

The correlation between LYTR.DE and EN4C.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021

0.82

The correlation between LYTR.DE and EN4C.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYTR.DE vs. EN4C.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYTR.DE
LYTR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LYTR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYTR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYTR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
LYTR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYTR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

EN4C.DE
EN4C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
EN4C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EN4C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
EN4C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EN4C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EN4C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYTR.DE vs. EN4C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) and L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (EN4C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYTR.DEEN4C.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.29

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.47

3.44

+2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.93

8.36

+8.57

LYTR.DE vs. EN4C.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYTR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is higher than the EN4C.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYTR.DE and EN4C.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYTR.DEEN4C.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

1.69

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.72

-0.60

Drawdowns

LYTR.DE vs. EN4C.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYTR.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than EN4C.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYTR.DE and EN4C.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYTR.DEEN4C.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.69%

-25.41%

-42.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-8.81%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.04%

-17.63%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.72%

-4.02%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.29%

-13.89%

-17.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

3.64%

+0.19%

Volatility

LYTR.DE vs. EN4C.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) is 5.20%, while L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (EN4C.DE) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that LYTR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EN4C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYTR.DEEN4C.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

5.98%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.33%

14.54%

+5.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.94%

17.98%

+4.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.40%

18.11%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

18.11%

+0.09%

LYTR.DE vs. EN4C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LYTR.DE and EN4C.DE have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

LYTR.DE vs. EN4C.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYTR.DE nor EN4C.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LYTR.DE and EN4C.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYTR.DE and EN4C.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

LYTR.DE tracks Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted, while EN4C.DE tracks Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Legal & General.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYTR.DE and EN4C.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer