EN4C.DE vs. BCFU.DE
EN4C.DE (L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF) and BCFU.DE (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both Commodities funds - EN4C.DE tracks the Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped while BCFU.DE tracks the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EN4C.DE returned 9.70%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for BCFU.DE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EN4C.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for BCFU.DE.
Performance
EN4C.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EN4C.DE is traded in EUR, while BCFU.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCFU.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EN4C.DE achieves a 24.44% return, which is significantly higher than BCFU.DE's 19.04% return.
EN4C.DE
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 24.44%
- 6M
- 23.57%
- 1Y
- 30.49%
- 3Y*
- 9.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCFU.DE
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 19.04%
- 6M
- 20.49%
- 1Y
- 30.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.53%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- —
EN4C.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EN4C.DE L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF | 24.44% | -3.13% | 9.93% | -5.63% | 29.83% | 10.18% |
BCFU.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 19.04% | 5.83% | 11.25% | -8.45% | 23.71% | 8.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between EN4C.DE and BCFU.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.87 |
The correlation between EN4C.DE and BCFU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EN4C.DE vs. BCFU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EN4C.DE
BCFU.DE
EN4C.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (EN4C.DE) and UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EN4C.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 4.30 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.36 | 9.99 | -1.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EN4C.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 1.98 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.62 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
EN4C.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EN4C.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.41%, roughly equal to the maximum BCFU.DE drawdown of -25.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EN4C.DE and BCFU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EN4C.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.41% | -25.15% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -7.03% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.63% | -13.93% | -3.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -3.51% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.89% | -11.04% | -2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 3.03% | +0.61% |
Volatility
EN4C.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Volatility Comparison
L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (EN4C.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) at 4.47%. This indicates that EN4C.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCFU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EN4C.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 4.47% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.54% | 12.82% | +1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.98% | 15.29% | +2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 16.95% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 15.33% | +2.78% |
EN4C.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EN4C.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BCFU.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
EN4C.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EN4C.DE nor BCFU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EN4C.DE and BCFU.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EN4C.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EN4C.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for BCFU.DE.
EN4C.DE tracks Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped, while BCFU.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EN4C.DE and 0.34% for BCFU.DE.
Find the right allocation for EN4C.DE and BCFU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer