LYSCF vs. RNMBY
LYSCF (Lynas Rare Earths Ltd) and RNMBY (Rheinmetall AG ADR) are both stocks. LYSCF operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while RNMBY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LYSCF returned 67.17%/yr vs 36.17%/yr for RNMBY. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LYSCF vs. RNMBY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYSCF achieves a 18.18% return, which is significantly higher than RNMBY's -27.26% return. Over the past 10 years, LYSCF has outperformed RNMBY with an annualized return of 67.17%, while RNMBY has yielded a comparatively lower 36.17% annualized return.
LYSCF
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -21.37%
- 6M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- 18.18%
- 1Y
- 39.60%
- 3Y*
- 29.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.38%
- 10Y*
- 67.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.49%
RNMBY
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- 6M
- -36.90%
- YTD
- -27.26%
- 1Y
- -32.52%
- 3Y*
- 67.41%
- 5Y*
- 71.11%
- 10Y*
- 36.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 30.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $217.43K | $200.55K | $312.75K | |
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR | $13.82M | $17.27M | $25.26M |
LYSCF vs. RNMBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYSCF Lynas Rare Earths Ltd | 18.18% | 105.74% | -17.15% | -8.68% | -28.76% | 142.35% | 87.20% | 48.08% | -35.23% | 3,404.10% |
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR | -27.26% | 190.28% | 99.83% | 63.35% | 122.00% | -13.84% | -2.03% | 28.14% | -29.38% | 98.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYSCF and RNMBY is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2012 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
LYSCF:
$9.90B
RNMBY:
$61.24B
LYSCF:
A$0.14
RNMBY:
€3.74
LYSCF:
102.47
RNMBY:
61.00
LYSCF:
15.77
RNMBY:
2.79
LYSCF:
11.38
RNMBY:
4.59
LYSCF:
4.06
RNMBY:
9.98
LYSCF:
A$1.20B
RNMBY:
€9.58B
LYSCF:
A$303.37M
RNMBY:
€4.12B
LYSCF:
A$239.40M
RNMBY:
€1.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYSCF vs. RNMBY — Risk / Return Rank
LYSCF
RNMBY
LYSCF vs. RNMBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd (LYSCF) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LYSCF | RNMBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.91 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | -0.61 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.89 | -1.23 | +3.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LYSCF vs. RNMBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYSCF drawdown since its inception was -99.17%, which is greater than RNMBY's maximum drawdown of -67.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYSCF and RNMBY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYSCF | RNMBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.17% | -67.75% | -31.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.64% | -53.78% | +7.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.64% | -53.78% | +7.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.89% | -53.78% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.48% | -67.75% | -4.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.18% | -43.19% | +6.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.53% | -17.03% | -35.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.19% | 26.54% | -2.35% |
Volatility
LYSCF vs. RNMBY - Volatility Comparison
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd (LYSCF) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) have volatilities of 12.78% and 12.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYSCF | RNMBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.78% | 12.96% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.39% | 40.28% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.29% | 49.84% | +15.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.57% | 45.92% | +5.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 264.99% | 41.89% | +223.10% |
Dividends
LYSCF vs. RNMBY - Dividend Comparison
LYSCF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RNMBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYSCF Lynas Rare Earths Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR | 1.03% | 0.49% | 0.96% | 1.46% | 1.82% | 1.72% | 1.56% | 1.36% | 1.47% | 2.06% | 2.97% | 0.53% |
Financials
LYSCF vs. RNMBY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lynas Rare Earths Ltd and Rheinmetall AG ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LYSCF vs. RNMBY - Profitability Comparison
LYSCF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd reported a gross profit of 116.62M and revenue of 413.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.
RNMBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a gross profit of 430.97M and revenue of 1.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.
LYSCF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd reported an operating income of 80.71M and revenue of 413.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.
RNMBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported an operating income of 178.89M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
LYSCF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd reported a net income of 80.18M and revenue of 413.53M, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.
RNMBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a net income of 112.83M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYSCF and RNMBY have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNMBY has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to LYSCF (12.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYSCF dropped -99.17% vs RNMBY's -67.75%.
LYSCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LYSCF and RNMBY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer