PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYSCF vs. RNMBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LYSCF vs. RNMBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lynas Rare Earths Ltd (LYSCF) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYSCF achieves a 66.55% return, which is significantly higher than RNMBY's -23.30% return. Over the past 10 years, LYSCF has outperformed RNMBY with an annualized return of 75.70%, while RNMBY has yielded a comparatively lower 37.34% annualized return.


LYSCF

1D
0.15%
1M
2.23%
YTD
66.55%
6M
41.65%
1Y
165.00%
3Y*
38.69%
5Y*
26.69%
10Y*
75.70%

RNMBY

1D
-0.10%
1M
-12.78%
YTD
-23.30%
6M
-21.38%
1Y
-33.14%
3Y*
76.84%
5Y*
69.62%
10Y*
37.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYSCF vs. RNMBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYSCF
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd
66.55%105.74%-17.15%-8.68%-28.76%142.35%87.20%48.08%-35.23%3,404.10%
RNMBY
Rheinmetall AG ADR
-23.30%190.28%99.83%63.35%122.00%-13.84%-2.03%28.14%-29.38%98.17%

Correlation

The correlation between LYSCF and RNMBY is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2012

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LYSCF:

$13.51B

RNMBY:

$64.74B

EPS

LYSCF:

$0.14

RNMBY:

$3.56

PE Ratio

LYSCF:

99.19

RNMBY:

77.84

PEG Ratio

LYSCF:

15.26

RNMBY:

3.56

PS Ratio

LYSCF:

11.02

RNMBY:

5.86

PB Ratio

LYSCF:

4.02

RNMBY:

12.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

LYSCF:

$1.20B

RNMBY:

$9.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LYSCF:

$303.37M

RNMBY:

$4.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

LYSCF:

$239.40M

RNMBY:

$1.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYSCF vs. RNMBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYSCF
LYSCF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
LYSCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYSCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYSCF Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
LYSCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYSCF Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

RNMBY
RNMBY Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
RNMBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNMBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNMBY Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RNMBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNMBY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYSCF vs. RNMBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd (LYSCF) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYSCFRNMBYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.49

-0.71

+3.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.72

-0.86

+3.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.90

+0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

-0.75

+4.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.47

-1.72

+9.19

LYSCF vs. RNMBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYSCF Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the RNMBY Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYSCF and RNMBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYSCFRNMBYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

-0.71

+3.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

1.56

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.90

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.80

-0.73

Drawdowns

LYSCF vs. RNMBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYSCF drawdown since its inception was -99.17%, which is greater than RNMBY's maximum drawdown of -67.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYSCF and RNMBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYSCFRNMBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.17%

-67.75%

-31.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.64%

-44.06%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.64%

-44.06%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.89%

-44.06%

-13.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.48%

-67.75%

-4.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.47%

-40.10%

+28.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.78%

-16.69%

-36.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.18%

19.29%

+2.89%

Volatility

LYSCF vs. RNMBY - Volatility Comparison

Lynas Rare Earths Ltd (LYSCF) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) have volatilities of 17.21% and 17.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYSCFRNMBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.21%

17.60%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.93%

34.43%

+9.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.78%

46.66%

+20.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.56%

44.76%

+6.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

265.23%

41.55%

+223.68%

Dividends

LYSCF vs. RNMBY - Dividend Comparison

LYSCF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RNMBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYSCF
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RNMBY
Rheinmetall AG ADR
0.98%0.49%0.96%1.46%1.82%1.72%1.56%1.36%1.47%2.06%2.97%0.53%

Financials

LYSCF vs. RNMBY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lynas Rare Earths Ltd and Rheinmetall AG ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B202120222023202420252026
413.53M
1.97B
(LYSCF) Total Revenue
(RNMBY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LYSCF vs. RNMBY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lynas Rare Earths Ltd and Rheinmetall AG ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202120222023202420252026
28.2%
21.9%
Portfolio components
LYSCF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd reported a gross profit of 116.62M and revenue of 413.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.

RNMBY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a gross profit of 430.97M and revenue of 1.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.

LYSCF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd reported an operating income of 80.71M and revenue of 413.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.

RNMBY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported an operating income of 178.89M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

LYSCF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd reported a net income of 80.18M and revenue of 413.53M, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.

RNMBY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a net income of 112.83M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LYSCF and RNMBY have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNMBY has higher volatility (17.60%) compared to LYSCF (17.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYSCF dropped -99.17% vs RNMBY's -67.75%.

LYSCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYSCF and RNMBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer