LYSCF vs. FNMA
LYSCF (Lynas Rare Earths Ltd) and FNMA (Federal National Mortgage Association) are both stocks. LYSCF operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while FNMA operates in Mortgage Finance (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, LYSCF returned 75.70%/yr vs 10.59%/yr for FNMA. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LYSCF vs. FNMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYSCF achieves a 66.55% return, which is significantly higher than FNMA's -40.82% return. Over the past 10 years, LYSCF has outperformed FNMA with an annualized return of 75.70%, while FNMA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.59% annualized return.
LYSCF
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 66.55%
- 6M
- 41.65%
- 1Y
- 165.00%
- 3Y*
- 38.69%
- 5Y*
- 26.69%
- 10Y*
- 75.70%
FNMA
- 1D
- -9.93%
- 1M
- -26.84%
- YTD
- -40.82%
- 6M
- -45.07%
- 1Y
- -32.16%
- 3Y*
- 144.17%
- 5Y*
- 22.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.59%
LYSCF vs. FNMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYSCF Lynas Rare Earths Ltd | 66.55% | 105.74% | -17.15% | -8.68% | -28.76% | 142.35% | 87.20% | 48.08% | -35.23% | 3,404.10% |
FNMA Federal National Mortgage Association | -40.82% | 227.13% | 206.54% | 202.77% | -56.90% | -65.69% | -23.40% | 194.34% | -60.00% | -32.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYSCF and FNMA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
LYSCF:
$13.51B
FNMA:
$37.42B
LYSCF:
$0.14
FNMA:
$2.77
LYSCF:
99.19
FNMA:
2.29
LYSCF:
15.26
FNMA:
0.00
LYSCF:
11.02
FNMA:
0.23
LYSCF:
$1.20B
FNMA:
$161.03B
LYSCF:
$303.37M
FNMA:
$117.99B
LYSCF:
$239.40M
FNMA:
$111.39B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYSCF vs. FNMA — Risk / Return Rank
LYSCF
FNMA
LYSCF vs. FNMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd (LYSCF) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYSCF | FNMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.00 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | -0.46 | +4.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.47 | -0.89 | +8.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYSCF | FNMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | -0.34 | +2.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.25 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.13 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
LYSCF vs. FNMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYSCF drawdown since its inception was -99.17%, roughly equal to the maximum FNMA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYSCF and FNMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYSCF | FNMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.17% | -99.74% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.64% | -69.76% | +23.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.64% | -69.76% | +23.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.89% | -85.40% | +27.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.48% | -92.13% | +19.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.47% | -91.33% | +79.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.78% | -46.16% | -6.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.18% | 36.31% | -14.13% |
Volatility
LYSCF vs. FNMA - Volatility Comparison
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd (LYSCF) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) have volatilities of 17.21% and 17.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYSCF | FNMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.21% | 17.91% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.93% | 66.26% | -22.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.78% | 94.78% | -28.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.56% | 91.90% | -40.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 265.23% | 81.90% | +183.33% |
Dividends
LYSCF vs. FNMA - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYSCF nor FNMA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LYSCF vs. FNMA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lynas Rare Earths Ltd and Federal National Mortgage Association. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LYSCF vs. FNMA - Profitability Comparison
LYSCF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd reported a gross profit of 116.62M and revenue of 413.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.
FNMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 40.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LYSCF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd reported an operating income of 80.71M and revenue of 413.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.
FNMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 40.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
LYSCF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd reported a net income of 80.18M and revenue of 413.53M, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.
FNMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported a net income of 5.61B and revenue of 40.22B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYSCF and FNMA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNMA has higher volatility (17.91%) compared to LYSCF (17.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYSCF dropped -99.17% vs FNMA's -99.74%.
LYSCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LYSCF and FNMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer