LYSCF vs. REMX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LYSCF (Lynas Rare Earths Ltd) is a stock, while REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Over the past 10 years, LYSCF returned 67.17%/yr vs 5.76%/yr for REMX. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

LYSCF vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lynas Rare Earths Ltd (LYSCF) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYSCF achieves a 18.18% return, which is significantly higher than REMX's -10.75% return. Over the past 10 years, LYSCF has outperformed REMX with an annualized return of 67.17%, while REMX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.76% annualized return.

LYSCF

• 1D: -1.47%
• 1M: -21.37%
• 6M: -4.22%
• YTD: 18.18%
• 1Y: 39.60%
• 3Y*: 29.21%
• 5Y*: 12.38%
• 10Y*: 67.17%
• ALL TIME*: 12.49%

REMX

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -23.93%
• 6M: -22.96%
• YTD: -10.75%
• 1Y: 36.09%
• 3Y*: -4.84%
• 5Y*: -7.48%
• 10Y*: 5.76%
• ALL TIME*: -5.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LYSCF Lynas Rare Earths Ltd	$217.43K	$200.55K	$312.75K
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF	$50.08M	$56.30M	$87.87M

LYSCF vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LYSCF Lynas Rare Earths Ltd	18.18%	105.74%	-17.15%	-8.68%	-28.76%	142.35%	87.20%	48.08%	-35.23%	3,404.10%
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF	-10.75%	92.95%	-35.02%	-19.18%	-31.13%	79.81%	64.82%	0.74%	-49.63%	82.60%

Correlation

The correlation between LYSCF and REMX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2010	0.43

The correlation between LYSCF and REMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LYSCF vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LYSCF

LYSCF Risk / Return Rank: 66
LYSCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
LYSCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
LYSCF Omega Ratio Rank: 65
LYSCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
LYSCF Martin Ratio Rank: 64

REMX

REMX Risk / Return Rank: 31
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LYSCF vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd (LYSCF) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LYSCF	REMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	0.74	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	1.29	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.15	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	0.89	+0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.89	2.75	-0.87

LYSCF vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYSCF Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is comparable to the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYSCF and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LYSCF vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYSCF drawdown since its inception was -99.17%, which is greater than REMX's maximum drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYSCF and REMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LYSCF	REMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.17%	-90.20%	-8.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.64%	-41.03%	-5.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.64%	-58.11%	+11.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.89%	-73.34%	+15.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.48%	-73.34%	+0.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.18%	-69.79%	+32.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.53%	-66.81%	+14.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.19%	13.28%	+10.91%

Volatility

LYSCF vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

Lynas Rare Earths Ltd (LYSCF) has a higher volatility of 12.78% compared to VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) at 11.77%. This indicates that LYSCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LYSCF	REMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.78%	11.77%	+1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.39%	37.31%	+5.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.29%	49.87%	+15.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.57%	40.57%	+11.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	264.99%	37.30%	+227.69%

Dividends

LYSCF vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

LYSCF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LYSCF Lynas Rare Earths Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF	1.97%	1.76%	2.56%	0.00%	1.56%	5.25%	0.81%	1.64%	12.43%	2.89%	2.23%	4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LYSCF and REMX in my portfolio?

LYSCF and REMX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LYSCF or REMX?

LYSCF has higher volatility (12.78%) compared to REMX (11.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYSCF dropped -99.17% vs REMX's -90.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.