LYMZ.DE vs. XSNR.L
LYMZ.DE (Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF) and XSNR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - LYMZ.DE is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Daily Leverage Index, while XSNR.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LYMZ.DE returned 15.82%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for XSNR.L. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LYMZ.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XSNR.L.
Performance
LYMZ.DE vs. XSNR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LYMZ.DE is traded in EUR, while XSNR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSNR.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYMZ.DE achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly higher than XSNR.L's 8.27% return. Over the past 10 years, LYMZ.DE has outperformed XSNR.L with an annualized return of 15.82%, while XSNR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.82% annualized return.
LYMZ.DE
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 14.06%
- 1Y
- 26.14%
- 3Y*
- 25.17%
- 5Y*
- 17.14%
- 10Y*
- 15.82%
XSNR.L
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -3.90%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
LYMZ.DE vs. XSNR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYMZ.DE Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF | 11.52% | 39.84% | 15.21% | 41.48% | -21.87% | 49.32% | -15.91% | 64.99% | -24.78% | 18.73% |
XSNR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 8.27% | 14.34% | 10.28% | 24.15% | -18.95% | 29.07% | 6.08% | 35.47% | -13.17% | 16.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYMZ.DE and XSNR.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008 | 0.80 |
The correlation between LYMZ.DE and XSNR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYMZ.DE vs. XSNR.L — Risk / Return Rank
LYMZ.DE
XSNR.L
LYMZ.DE vs. XSNR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYMZ.DE | XSNR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.14 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 1.01 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | 3.53 | +0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYMZ.DE | XSNR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 0.72 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.46 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.55 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.28 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
LYMZ.DE vs. XSNR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYMZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -84.31%, which is greater than XSNR.L's maximum drawdown of -65.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMZ.DE and XSNR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYMZ.DE | XSNR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.31% | -65.84% | -18.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.17% | -13.46% | -7.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.42% | -20.00% | -11.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.28% | -31.06% | -13.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.87% | -42.65% | -21.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -3.90% | +2.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.16% | -14.35% | -25.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.63% | 3.86% | +2.77% |
Volatility
LYMZ.DE vs. XSNR.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.89% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) at 5.26%. This indicates that LYMZ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSNR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYMZ.DE | XSNR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.89% | 5.26% | +4.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.73% | 15.27% | +10.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.86% | 18.92% | +12.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.01% | 19.24% | +15.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.32% | 19.71% | +16.61% |
LYMZ.DE vs. XSNR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYMZ.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XSNR.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYMZ.DE vs. XSNR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYMZ.DE nor XSNR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYMZ.DE and XSNR.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSNR.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSNR.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LYMZ.DE.
LYMZ.DE is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XSNR.L is Industrials Equities. LYMZ.DE tracks EURO STOXX 50 Daily Leverage Index, while XSNR.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LYMZ.DE and 0.20% for XSNR.L.
Find the right allocation for LYMZ.DE and XSNR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer