LYLD vs. PRF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LYLD (Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF) and PRF (Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. LYLD is actively managed, while PRF is passively managed. Over the past year, LYLD returned 20.39% vs 32.80% for PRF. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for PRF.

Performance

LYLD vs. PRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYLD achieves a 8.49% return, which is significantly lower than PRF's 14.79% return.

LYLD

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 8.49%
• 6M: 9.53%
• 1Y: 20.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRF

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 14.79%
• 6M: 15.01%
• 1Y: 32.80%
• 3Y*: 21.40%
• 5Y*: 12.43%
• 10Y*: 13.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYLD vs. PRF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LYLD Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF	8.49%	12.90%	1.19%
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF	14.79%	18.33%	4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between LYLD and PRF is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2024	0.87

The correlation between LYLD and PRF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LYLD vs. PRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYLD

LYLD Risk / Return Rank: 54
LYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
LYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
LYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 51
LYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
LYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 53

PRF

PRF Risk / Return Rank: 89
PRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PRF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PRF Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYLD vs. PRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LYLD	PRF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	3.10	-1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	4.33	-1.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.57	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	5.00	-2.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.90	20.67	-11.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LYLD vs. PRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the PRF Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYLD and PRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LYLD	PRF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	3.10	-1.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.48	+0.30

Drawdowns

LYLD vs. PRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYLD drawdown since its inception was -18.64%, smaller than the maximum PRF drawdown of -60.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYLD and PRF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LYLD	PRF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.64%	-60.35%	+41.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.70%	-6.59%	-1.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.72%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.68%	-0.20%	-1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.67%	-6.93%	+3.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	1.59%	+0.71%

Volatility

LYLD vs. PRF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD) is 2.19%, while Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) has a volatility of 2.64%. This indicates that LYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LYLD	PRF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.19%	2.64%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.72%	7.74%	-0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.45%	10.63%	+0.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.62%	15.18%	+0.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.62%	17.67%	-2.05%

LYLD vs. PRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PRF's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

LYLD vs. PRF - Dividend Comparison

LYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than PRF's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LYLD Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF	2.64%	2.79%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF	1.38%	1.59%	1.78%	1.84%	2.01%	1.58%	1.97%	1.99%	2.25%	1.58%	2.17%	2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LYLD and PRF in my portfolio?

LYLD and PRF have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LYLD or PRF?

PRF has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to LYLD (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYLD dropped -18.64% vs PRF's -60.35%.

Which ETF is better, LYLD or PRF?

On 1-year performance, PRF leads with 32.80% vs 20.39% for LYLD. On fees, PRF is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, LYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LYLD or PRF?

Over the 1-year period, PRF has performed better with a 32.80% return vs 20.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LYLD or PRF?

PRF is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for LYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LYLD or PRF?

LYLD has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 1.38% for PRF.

What is the main difference between LYLD and PRF?

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for LYLD and 0.34% for PRF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.