PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYLD vs. AVLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYLD vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYLD achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 20.47% return.


LYLD

1D
0.38%
1M
0.72%
YTD
9.04%
6M
10.59%
1Y
22.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVLV

1D
0.85%
1M
5.27%
YTD
20.47%
6M
22.94%
1Y
39.74%
3Y*
23.18%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYLD vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LYLD
Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF
9.04%12.90%1.19%
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
20.47%15.12%5.11%

Correlation

The correlation between LYLD and AVLV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2024

0.85

The correlation between LYLD and AVLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYLD vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYLD
LYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

AVLV
AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYLD vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYLDAVLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

3.25

-1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.84

4.48

-1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.58

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

6.33

-3.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.72

25.35

-15.63

LYLD vs. AVLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the AVLV Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYLD and AVLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYLDAVLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

3.25

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.86

-0.07

Drawdowns

LYLD vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYLD drawdown since its inception was -18.64%, roughly equal to the maximum AVLV drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYLD and AVLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYLDAVLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.64%

-19.50%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.70%

-6.39%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

0.00%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-3.93%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

1.59%

+0.70%

Volatility

LYLD vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD) is 2.24%, while Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) has a volatility of 3.17%. This indicates that LYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYLDAVLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.24%

3.17%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.70%

9.05%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.43%

12.29%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.63%

17.36%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.63%

17.36%

-1.73%

LYLD vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYLD vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison

LYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than AVLV's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
1.07%1.33%1.58%1.85%2.00%0.29%
LYLD
Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF
2.62%2.79%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYLD and AVLV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVLV has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to LYLD (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYLD dropped -18.64% vs AVLV's -19.50%.

On 1-year performance, AVLV leads with 39.74% vs 22.07% for LYLD. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, LYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 39.74% return vs 22.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for LYLD.

LYLD has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.07% for AVLV.

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for LYLD and 0.15% for AVLV.

AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYLD and AVLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer