PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYG vs. NWG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LYG vs. NWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) and NatWest Group plc (NWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYG achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly higher than NWG's -5.18% return. Over the past 10 years, LYG has underperformed NWG with an annualized return of 8.00%, while NWG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.97% annualized return.


LYG

1D
-0.19%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
2.45%
6M
6.89%
1Y
31.26%
3Y*
39.69%
5Y*
20.09%
10Y*
8.00%

NWG

1D
0.76%
1M
0.51%
YTD
-5.18%
6M
0.44%
1Y
17.10%
3Y*
43.71%
5Y*
30.30%
10Y*
15.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYG vs. NWG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYG
Lloyds Banking Group plc
2.45%103.71%20.30%14.68%-9.47%33.81%-40.79%36.81%-28.35%30.79%
NWG
NatWest Group plc
-5.18%81.29%92.31%-4.69%11.23%39.24%-24.92%29.18%-26.25%38.16%

Correlation

The correlation between LYG and NWG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2007

0.76

The correlation between LYG and NWG shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

LYG:

$0.45

NWG:

$2.95

PE Ratio

LYG:

11.86

NWG:

5.39

PEG Ratio

LYG:

5.93

NWG:

0.20

PS Ratio

LYG:

0.92

NWG:

1.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

LYG:

$65.49B

NWG:

$29.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LYG:

$65.49B

NWG:

$16.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

LYG:

$7.17B

NWG:

$9.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYG vs. NWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYG
LYG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYG Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
LYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

NWG
NWG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
NWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
NWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYG vs. NWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) and NatWest Group plc (NWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYGNWGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.11

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

0.71

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.85

1.80

+2.05

LYG vs. NWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the NWG Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYG and NWG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYGNWGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

0.55

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.91

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.42

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

-0.11

+0.08

Drawdowns

LYG vs. NWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYG drawdown since its inception was -94.84%, roughly equal to the maximum NWG drawdown of -96.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYG and NWG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYGNWGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.84%

-96.96%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.72%

-24.03%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.72%

-34.62%

+11.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.19%

-40.56%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.72%

-67.34%

-1.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.66%

-71.45%

+13.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.42%

-86.22%

+22.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.15%

9.60%

-1.45%

Volatility

LYG vs. NWG - Volatility Comparison

Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) and NatWest Group plc (NWG) have volatilities of 8.88% and 8.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYGNWGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

8.65%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.77%

23.92%

-2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.07%

31.41%

-3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.06%

33.53%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.52%

38.32%

-1.80%

Dividends

LYG vs. NWG - Dividend Comparison

LYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than NWG's 5.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYG
Lloyds Banking Group plc
3.76%3.19%5.44%5.23%4.92%2.70%0.00%5.04%6.63%6.81%5.17%2.11%
NWG
NatWest Group plc
5.51%3.69%4.36%9.42%11.57%2.74%4.59%9.75%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LYG vs. NWG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lloyds Banking Group plc and NatWest Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00B0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
5.18B
7.39B
(LYG) Total Revenue
(NWG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LYG vs. NWG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lloyds Banking Group plc and NatWest Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
59.0%
Portfolio components
LYG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a gross profit of 5.18B and revenue of 5.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

NWG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NatWest Group plc reported a gross profit of 4.36B and revenue of 7.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.

LYG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported an operating income of 2.03B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.1%.

NWG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NatWest Group plc reported an operating income of 2.03B and revenue of 7.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.

LYG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a net income of 1.53B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in a net margin of 29.5%.

NWG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NatWest Group plc reported a net income of 1.51B and revenue of 7.39B, resulting in a net margin of 20.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LYG and NWG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LYG has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to NWG (8.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYG dropped -94.84% vs NWG's -96.96%.

LYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYG and NWG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer