LYFT vs. CRWD
LYFT (Lyft, Inc.) and CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — LYFT in Software - Application, CRWD in Software - Infrastructure. Over the past 5 years, LYFT returned -23.62%/yr vs 23.14%/yr for CRWD. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LYFT vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYFT achieves a -19.41% return, which is significantly lower than CRWD's 59.72% return.
LYFT
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 13.86%
- 6M
- -18.74%
- YTD
- -19.41%
- 1Y
- 4.69%
- 3Y*
- 10.56%
- 5Y*
- -23.62%
- 10Y*
- —
CRWD
- 1D
- -5.66%
- 1M
- 8.27%
- 6M
- 59.10%
- YTD
- 59.72%
- 1Y
- 56.49%
- 3Y*
- 70.60%
- 5Y*
- 23.14%
- 10Y*
- —
LYFT vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYFT Lyft, Inc. | -19.41% | 50.16% | -13.94% | 36.03% | -74.21% | -13.03% | 14.20% | -25.92% |
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 59.72% | 37.00% | 34.01% | 142.49% | -48.58% | -3.34% | 324.74% | -21.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYFT and CRWD is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019 | 0.35 |
The correlation between LYFT and CRWD shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LYFT:
$5.93B
CRWD:
$190.60B
LYFT:
$6.95
CRWD:
-$0.02
LYFT:
0.98
CRWD:
9.34
LYFT:
2.08
CRWD:
10.42
LYFT:
$6.52B
CRWD:
$5.09B
LYFT:
$2.82B
CRWD:
$3.82B
LYFT:
$51.76M
CRWD:
$246.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYFT vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank
LYFT
CRWD
LYFT vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LYFT | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.22 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 1.45 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | 3.43 | -3.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LYFT vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYFT drawdown since its inception was -90.84%, which is greater than CRWD's maximum drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYFT and CRWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYFT | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.84% | -67.69% | -23.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.51% | -37.18% | -11.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.23% | -44.44% | -10.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.00% | -67.69% | -18.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.11% | -6.12% | -75.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.49% | -23.45% | -45.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.14% | 15.79% | +14.35% |
Volatility
LYFT vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison
Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) have volatilities of 13.25% and 13.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYFT | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.25% | 13.07% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.98% | 38.28% | -3.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.54% | 46.13% | +4.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.53% | 50.80% | +16.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.05% | 55.95% | +12.10% |
Dividends
LYFT vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYFT nor CRWD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LYFT vs. CRWD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lyft, Inc. and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LYFT vs. CRWD - Profitability Comparison
LYFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported a gross profit of 786.35M and revenue of 1.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.6%.
CRWD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.3%.
LYFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.33M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
CRWD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -30.60M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.
LYFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported a net income of 14.25M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.
CRWD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 45.97M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYFT and CRWD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LYFT has higher volatility (13.25%) compared to CRWD (13.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYFT dropped -90.84% vs CRWD's -67.69%.
CRWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LYFT and CRWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer