PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYB vs. RTO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LYB vs. RTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB) and Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYB achieves a 52.18% return, which is significantly higher than RTO's 1.47% return. Over the past 10 years, LYB has underperformed RTO with an annualized return of 5.52%, while RTO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.15% annualized return.


LYB

1D
-0.11%
1M
-9.28%
YTD
52.18%
6M
55.85%
1Y
22.76%
3Y*
-4.07%
5Y*
-4.10%
10Y*
5.52%

RTO

1D
-0.57%
1M
-11.59%
YTD
1.47%
6M
5.37%
1Y
27.58%
3Y*
-8.09%
5Y*
-1.13%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYB vs. RTO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
52.18%-35.96%-17.38%20.70%-0.98%5.07%2.64%44.63%-21.69%33.72%
RTO
Rentokil Initial PLC
1.47%19.64%-9.78%-5.92%-22.27%14.36%16.84%42.28%-0.22%64.45%

Correlation

The correlation between LYB and RTO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2010

0.18

Fundamentals

EPS

LYB:

-$3.19

RTO:

$1.39

PS Ratio

LYB:

0.70

RTO:

1.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

LYB:

$22.48B

RTO:

$11.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LYB:

-$4.33B

RTO:

$1.54B

EBITDA (TTM)

LYB:

$935.00M

RTO:

$2.16B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYB vs. RTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYB
LYB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYB Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

RTO
RTO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
RTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYB vs. RTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB) and Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYBRTODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.18

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

1.78

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.15

5.00

-3.85

LYB vs. RTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYB Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the RTO Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYB and RTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYBRTODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

0.91

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

-0.03

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.31

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.12

+0.28

Drawdowns

LYB vs. RTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYB drawdown since its inception was -63.26%, smaller than the maximum RTO drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYB and RTO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYBRTODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.26%

-86.53%

+23.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.45%

-15.56%

-19.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.35%

-49.81%

-5.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.35%

-50.94%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.26%

-50.94%

-12.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.58%

-25.46%

-3.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.11%

-30.52%

+15.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.92%

5.53%

+14.39%

Volatility

LYB vs. RTO - Volatility Comparison

LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB) has a higher volatility of 7.06% compared to Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) at 5.68%. This indicates that LYB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYBRTODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.06%

5.68%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.31%

21.48%

+12.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.15%

30.56%

+15.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.82%

34.41%

-1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.76%

33.03%

+3.73%

Dividends

LYB vs. RTO - Dividend Comparison

LYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, more than RTO's 2.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
6.39%12.59%7.10%5.20%11.92%4.81%4.58%20.27%4.81%3.22%3.88%3.50%
RTO
Rentokil Initial PLC
2.32%2.23%2.28%1.73%1.38%1.30%0.00%0.87%1.14%1.69%2.99%1.54%

Financials

LYB vs. RTO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LyondellBasell Industries N.V. and Rentokil Initial PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B202220232024202520260
2.62B
(LYB) Total Revenue
(RTO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LYB and RTO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LYB has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to RTO (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYB dropped -63.26% vs RTO's -86.53%.

RTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYB and RTO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer