PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYB vs. F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LYB vs. F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB) and Ford Motor Company (F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYB achieves a 47.20% return, which is significantly higher than F's 12.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LYB having a 5.47% annualized return and F not far behind at 5.33%.


LYB

1D
1.85%
1M
6.49%
6M
23.00%
YTD
47.20%
1Y
2.64%
3Y*
-6.09%
5Y*
-1.87%
10Y*
5.47%
ALL TIME*
14.15%

F

1D
1.05%
1M
2.20%
6M
7.19%
YTD
12.50%
1Y
35.22%
3Y*
7.73%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
5.33%
ALL TIME*
5.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$660.71M$696.44M$882.48M
$264.40M$296.89M$349.44M

LYB vs. F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
47.20%-35.96%-17.38%20.70%-0.98%5.07%2.64%44.63%-21.69%33.72%
F
Ford Motor Company
12.50%42.35%-13.10%10.18%-42.18%137.48%-3.88%29.64%-34.35%8.73%

Correlation

The correlation between LYB and F is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2010

0.45

The correlation between LYB and F shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LYB:

$20.12B

F:

$56.38B

EPS

LYB:

-$3.58

F:

-$1.51

PS Ratio

LYB:

0.60

F:

0.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

LYB:

$22.48B

F:

$189.86B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LYB:

-$4.33B

F:

$17.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

LYB:

$935.00M

F:

$9.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYB vs. F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYB
LYB Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
LYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYB Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

F
F Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
F Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
F Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
F Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
F Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYB vs. F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB) and Ford Motor Company (F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYBFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.20

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

1.51

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.12

3.33

-3.21

LYB vs. F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYB Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the F Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYB and F, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYB vs. F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYB drawdown since its inception was -63.26%, smaller than the maximum F drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYB and F.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYBFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.26%

-97.07%

+33.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.51%

-23.39%

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.35%

-36.51%

-18.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.35%

-58.62%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.26%

-64.77%

+1.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.92%

-36.37%

+5.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.25%

-44.68%

+29.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.23%

10.61%

+11.62%

Volatility

LYB vs. F - Volatility Comparison

LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB) has a higher volatility of 8.84% compared to Ford Motor Company (F) at 7.38%. This indicates that LYB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYBFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.84%

7.38%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.28%

29.79%

+3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.86%

37.27%

+8.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.81%

39.37%

-6.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.79%

37.49%

-0.70%

Dividends

LYB vs. F - Dividend Comparison

LYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than F's 4.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
F
Ford Motor Company
4.16%5.72%7.88%4.92%4.30%0.48%1.71%6.45%9.54%5.20%7.01%4.26%
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
6.61%12.59%7.10%5.20%11.92%4.81%4.58%20.27%4.81%3.22%3.88%3.50%

Financials

LYB vs. F - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LyondellBasell Industries N.V. and Ford Motor Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
43.25B
(LYB) Total Revenue
(F) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LYB and F have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LYB has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to F (7.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYB dropped -63.26% vs F's -97.07%.

F currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYB and F

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer