LX vs. SCHA
LX (LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.) is a stock, while SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) is Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 5 years, LX returned -28.17%/yr vs 7.49%/yr for SCHA. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LX vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LX achieves a -51.73% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 19.43% return.
LX
- 1D
- -5.84%
- 1M
- -27.50%
- 6M
- -47.38%
- YTD
- -51.73%
- 1Y
- -74.26%
- 3Y*
- -8.07%
- 5Y*
- -28.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.18%
SCHA
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- 6M
- 11.37%
- YTD
- 19.43%
- 1Y
- 31.42%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.45%
LX vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LX LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. | -51.73% | -40.97% | 242.61% | 6.40% | -50.78% | -42.39% | -51.76% | 91.59% | -47.84% | 1,077.97% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 19.43% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | -0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between LX and SCHA is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2017 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LX vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
LX
SCHA
LX vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LX | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.71 | 1.28 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 3.32 | -4.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 11.38 | -12.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LX vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LX drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LX and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LX | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.19% | -42.41% | -50.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.22% | -9.50% | -68.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -85.64% | -27.29% | -58.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.72% | -30.79% | -55.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.66% | -6.26% | -83.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.60% | -7.54% | -56.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.88% | 2.77% | +51.11% |
Volatility
LX vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) has a higher volatility of 15.73% compared to Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) at 5.84%. This indicates that LX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LX | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.73% | 5.84% | +9.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.00% | 14.41% | +24.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.28% | 18.98% | +45.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.45% | 22.02% | +51.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 321.36% | 22.74% | +298.62% |
Dividends
LX vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
LX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.34%, more than SCHA's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LX LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. | 26.34% | 9.30% | 2.38% | 11.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.06% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LX and SCHA have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LX has higher volatility (15.73%) compared to SCHA (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LX dropped -93.19% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LX and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer