PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVMHF vs. ISRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LVMHF vs. ISRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMHF) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LVMHF having a -27.97% return and ISRG slightly lower at -28.09%. Over the past 10 years, LVMHF has underperformed ISRG with an annualized return of 16.21%, while ISRG has yielded a comparatively higher 19.13% annualized return.


LVMHF

1D
-2.96%
1M
2.67%
YTD
-27.97%
6M
-26.60%
1Y
1.08%
3Y*
-12.51%
5Y*
-4.41%
10Y*
16.21%

ISRG

1D
1.24%
1M
-9.96%
YTD
-28.09%
6M
-28.51%
1Y
-26.20%
3Y*
9.27%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
19.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVMHF vs. ISRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVMHF
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
-27.97%19.41%-16.25%14.75%-8.08%39.72%36.98%63.06%3.71%55.50%
ISRG
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
-28.09%8.51%54.72%27.14%-26.15%31.76%38.39%23.43%31.23%72.64%

Correlation

The correlation between LVMHF and ISRG is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2007

0.29

Fundamentals

EPS

LVMHF:

$93.94

ISRG:

$8.24

PE Ratio

LVMHF:

5.69

ISRG:

49.43

PS Ratio

LVMHF:

0.81

ISRG:

13.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

LVMHF:

$165.47B

ISRG:

$10.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LVMHF:

$110.27B

ISRG:

$7.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

LVMHF:

$47.81B

ISRG:

$3.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVMHF vs. ISRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVMHF
LVMHF Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
LVMHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVMHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVMHF Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
LVMHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVMHF Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ISRG
ISRG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ISRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISRG Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
ISRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISRG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVMHF vs. ISRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMHF) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LVMHFISRGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.86

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

-0.82

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.07

-1.65

+1.72

LVMHF vs. ISRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVMHF Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is higher than the ISRG Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVMHF and ISRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVMHFISRGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

-0.85

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.24

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.59

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.47

-0.20

Drawdowns

LVMHF vs. ISRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVMHF drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, smaller than the maximum ISRG drawdown of -82.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVMHF and ISRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVMHFISRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.09%

-82.26%

+20.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.28%

-32.14%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.08%

-34.10%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.08%

-49.90%

+5.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

-49.90%

+5.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.40%

-33.28%

-7.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-21.27%

+7.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.82%

15.91%

-1.09%

Volatility

LVMHF vs. ISRG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMHF) is 9.50%, while Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) has a volatility of 11.07%. This indicates that LVMHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVMHFISRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.50%

11.07%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.51%

20.23%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.44%

30.83%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.23%

33.15%

-0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.14%

32.38%

-1.24%

Dividends

LVMHF vs. ISRG - Dividend Comparison

LVMHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, while ISRG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISRG
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LVMHF
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
2.84%3.10%3.87%3.37%3.48%5.31%1.70%2.96%2.95%0.54%1.90%2.11%

Financials

LVMHF vs. ISRG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne and Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B202120222023202420252026
40.98B
2.77B
(LVMHF) Total Revenue
(ISRG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LVMHF vs. ISRG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

65.0%66.0%67.0%68.0%69.0%70.0%202120222023202420252026
65.6%
66.1%
Portfolio components
LVMHF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne reported a gross profit of 26.90B and revenue of 40.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.6%.

ISRG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.83B and revenue of 2.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.1%.

LVMHF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne reported an operating income of 13.42B and revenue of 40.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.7%.

ISRG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. reported an operating income of 855.30M and revenue of 2.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.

LVMHF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne reported a net income of 5.18B and revenue of 40.98B, resulting in a net margin of 12.6%.

ISRG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. reported a net income of 821.50M and revenue of 2.77B, resulting in a net margin of 29.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LVMHF and ISRG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISRG has higher volatility (11.07%) compared to LVMHF (9.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVMHF dropped -62.09% vs ISRG's -82.26%.

LVMHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVMHF and ISRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer