LVLN vs. GLD
LVLN (SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - LVLN is a Bank Loan fund tracking the S&P USD Select Leveraged Loan Index, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
LVLN vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVLN achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -7.91% return.
LVLN
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLD
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- -8.22%
- 6M
- -13.79%
- YTD
- -7.91%
- 1Y
- 18.39%
- 3Y*
- 26.20%
- 5Y*
- 16.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
LVLN vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 1.73% | 1.14% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -7.91% | 6.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVLN and GLD is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVLN vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
LVLN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GLD
LVLN vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF (LVLN) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVLN | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.70 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVLN vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVLN drawdown since its inception was -2.34%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVLN and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVLN | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -45.56% | +43.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -26.40% | +26.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.48% | -16.19% | +15.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.04% | — |
Volatility
LVLN vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVLN | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65% | 28.00% | -25.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.65% | 18.41% | -15.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.65% | 16.11% | -13.46% |
LVLN vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LVLN and GLD have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
LVLN vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
LVLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 4.30% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVLN and GLD have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVLN and GLD have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
LVLN has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
LVLN is categorized as Bank Loan, while GLD is Gold. LVLN tracks S&P USD Select Leveraged Loan Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM.
Find the right allocation for LVLN and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer