PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKLN vs. EFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKLN vs. EFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKLN achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly higher than EFT's -2.04% return. Over the past 10 years, BKLN has underperformed EFT with an annualized return of 4.23%, while EFT has yielded a comparatively higher 5.23% annualized return.


BKLN

1D
0.05%
1M
0.73%
6M
1.39%
YTD
0.65%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
6.92%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
4.23%
ALL TIME*
3.73%

EFT

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.79%
6M
-2.90%
YTD
-2.04%
1Y
-5.78%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
5.23%
ALL TIME*
4.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$118.65M$121.61M$174.22M
$699.02K$595.84K$824.52K

BKLN vs. EFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
0.65%6.88%8.21%12.53%-2.51%2.32%1.32%10.03%-1.32%2.13%
EFT
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust
-2.04%-3.77%13.17%27.14%-19.69%21.00%2.41%16.85%-6.14%1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between BKLN and EFT is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2011

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKLN vs. EFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BKLN
BKLN Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BKLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

EFT
EFT Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
EFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
EFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFT Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BKLN vs. EFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKLNEFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.87

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

-0.62

+1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.91

-1.39

+6.30

BKLN vs. EFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the EFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKLN and EFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKLN vs. EFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKLN drawdown since its inception was -24.17%, smaller than the maximum EFT drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLN and EFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKLNEFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.17%

-60.58%

+36.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-10.54%

+7.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.55%

-17.49%

+13.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.31%

-24.98%

+17.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.17%

-45.51%

+21.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-10.75%

+10.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-8.82%

+7.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

5.41%

-4.62%

Volatility

BKLN vs. EFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) is 0.34%, while Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that BKLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKLNEFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

1.36%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.53%

7.14%

-4.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77%

8.66%

-5.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.47%

12.71%

-8.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.41%

15.72%

-9.31%

Dividends

BKLN vs. EFT - Dividend Comparison

BKLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, less than EFT's 8.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
6.53%6.95%8.41%8.59%4.93%3.11%3.56%4.86%4.52%3.50%4.54%4.12%
EFT
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust
8.91%9.55%10.52%11.09%9.81%5.24%5.88%7.41%6.77%5.73%5.54%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKLN and EFT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFT has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to BKLN (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKLN dropped -24.17% vs EFT's -60.58%.

BKLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKLN and EFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer