PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHI vs. SMLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHI vs. SMLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly lower than SMLV's 14.57% return.


LVHI

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.49%
YTD
11.71%
6M
13.79%
1Y
29.95%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
15.80%
10Y*

SMLV

1D
0.57%
1M
2.06%
YTD
14.57%
6M
15.88%
1Y
25.23%
3Y*
16.23%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
10.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHI vs. SMLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVHI
Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
11.71%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%18.35%-5.22%12.26%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
14.57%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%-1.55%24.10%-6.62%5.68%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHI and SMLV is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016

0.53

The correlation between LVHI and SMLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

LVHI vs. SMLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVHI
SMLV

Financial Services

23.6%
30.5%

Energy

17.4%
1.8%

Industrials

13.4%
14.3%

Utilities

10.4%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
4.3%

Healthcare

7.4%
8.7%

Basic Materials

6.1%
3.2%

Communication Services

5.8%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
8.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
12.2%

Technology

0.1%
11.2%

Financial Services

LVHI
23.6%
SMLV
30.5%

Energy

LVHI
17.4%
SMLV
1.8%

Industrials

LVHI
13.4%
SMLV
14.3%

Utilities

LVHI
10.4%
SMLV
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

LVHI
8.7%
SMLV
4.3%

Healthcare

LVHI
7.4%
SMLV
8.7%

Basic Materials

LVHI
6.1%
SMLV
3.2%

Communication Services

LVHI
5.8%
SMLV
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

LVHI
5.3%
SMLV
8.7%

Real Estate

LVHI
1.9%
SMLV
12.2%

Technology

LVHI
0.1%
SMLV
11.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHI vs. SMLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHI vs. SMLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LVHISMLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.19

1.62

+1.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.37

2.33

+2.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.30

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.95

3.29

+1.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.63

9.04

+11.59

LVHI vs. SMLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHI Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the SMLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHI and SMLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVHISMLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

1.62

+1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.44

0.45

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.55

+0.27

Drawdowns

LVHI vs. SMLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum SMLV drawdown of -42.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and SMLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHISMLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-42.45%

+10.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.08%

-7.34%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.99%

-20.40%

+8.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.99%

-20.40%

+8.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

0.00%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-5.46%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

2.68%

-1.22%

Volatility

LVHI vs. SMLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) is 3.05%, while SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) has a volatility of 3.76%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHISMLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

3.76%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.50%

9.75%

-2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.45%

15.67%

-6.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.06%

18.27%

-7.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.76%

20.95%

-7.19%

LVHI vs. SMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SMLV's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVHI vs. SMLV - Dividend Comparison

LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than SMLV's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVHI
Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
4.50%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%0.00%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.31%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHI and SMLV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMLV has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to LVHI (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs SMLV's -42.45%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.80% vs 8.11% for SMLV. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.80% return vs 8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 2.31% for SMLV.

LVHI tracks QS International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index, while SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.12% for SMLV.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHI and SMLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer